Not really, but ok.In addition, we have Williams, Donnal, and Battle. Mostly unproven, but young and talented. I don't see any reason to spend more, or draft anyone else at this point. All it would mean is that we'd be quitting on young guys that we drafted, and have started developing.
So creepy and great.Trusting Rodger Saffold's body is like trusting this guy...
Not sure what the point of that was.Using your words here "Rams have no proven depth at" , I would say that this seems to be the norm with many posts on this post free agency Ram roster.
I would ask this...... Who is proven depth behind.....
#1-NT Brockers?
#2-DT Donald ?
#3-RDE-Quinn
#4-MLB JL?
#5-OLB Ogletree?
#6-OLB Ayers?
#7- FS (Fisher does not have a proven starter)
#8-Fullback
#9-QB (Fisher does not even have a proven starter)
#10-WR-Britt
#11-WR-Austin
#12- OL/Center (Fisher does not have a proven starter)
Looks to me that if a offensive post like OLT or the ORT does not have a proven depth then that's normal with this Fisher team. Not what you would expect going into year five of the Fisher regime...or is it? At least the loss of both UFA CB's (probable) would not be devastating.
Not sure what the point of that was.
It doesn't change what the depth situation is at T. But, I surrender. Donnal and Battle can be counted on. Got it.
I would keep Saffold.What would you suggest that we do?
Me too. I'm with you on that.I would keep Saffold.
Not the popular opinion and probably won't play out that way, but, that is what I would do.
Or look for a cheaper FA option....Reynolds paid off right away at a bargain price.Me too. I'm with you on that.
One of my all time favorites.So creepy and great.
I need to watch that movie again.