- Joined
- Dec 23, 2019
- Messages
- 2,184
It’s players and scheme. Years ago defenses struggled with the zbs. It’s not as tough to beat anymore. So, if you run that system you need a few guys that excel at it. The Rams lost their best run blocker in Whitworth. It’s likely to be just as bad if not worse this year.So anybody think it's time for a new run scheme? Or is it the execution?
To sympathize with Snead, too many NFL teams are not developing Olineman to play in the NFL. Most college blocking is from spread offenses.So anybody think it's time for a new run scheme? Or is it the execution?
Nothing wrong with scheme. Need better execution, physicality on both line and backsOr is it the execution?
I am hoping that means more Fullback type plays(like the 9er's use) with a TEMissed this thread, mods, feel free to merge or delete my previous thread start. Here's my post to wit:
Sure sounds like Jourdan was hinting at a two back offense in the latest 11 personnel pod in how she was gingerly talking about what she was not seeing at practice (being held back for closed ones) and how aligned Akers and Henderson were in "shared" RB 1 roles. She mentioned that McVay was not happy with run game last year and wanted to "push" it this year.
I would not be shocked to see a two back offense take a few snaps a game from 11 personnel and I'd throw a little bit of money at the idea that we will see some wildcat (ala 2020 playoff game vs GB) here and there in the offense too now that Akers is back.
Glad you added this info. Gives me some relief knowing we are looking for answers. Thx WestCoastMissed this thread, mods, feel free to merge or delete my previous thread start. Here's my post to wit:
Sure sounds like Jourdan was hinting at a two back offense in the latest 11 personnel pod in how she was gingerly talking about what she was not seeing at practice (being held back for closed ones) and how aligned Akers and Henderson were in "shared" RB 1 roles. She mentioned that McVay was not happy with run game last year and wanted to "push" it this year.
I would not be shocked to see a two back offense take a few snaps a game from 11 personnel and I'd throw a little bit of money at the idea that we will see some wildcat (ala 2020 playoff game vs GB) here and there in the offense too now that Akers is back.
Rushing Yards Over ExpectedWtf does Yards over expected mean?
These are a couple of great fucking posts. Damn.. great observations.To add:
I'm guessing here but I think McVay in overhauling the RB position is looking for "wide-back" for the running game now. Akers, Henderson and Williams all offer plus talent as pass catchers. McVay is just going after the role in reverse of Shanahan, looking for his wide-back from the RB room and not from the WR room.
I would expect to see Akers and Henderson on the field together and look at how the 49ers used Deebo as a possible example of what we'll see. One of them starting wide of the formation, then aligning in the backfield but in various alignments (wing, offset gun, etc...).
I am hoping that means more Fullback type plays(like the 9er's use) with a TE
playing fullback ,lead block role. as well as some misdirection that can be dialed up with
2 backs in the backfield.( Akers , Henderson)
Just glad McVay is focused on improving run game.
This alone would be music to my ears.more about misdirection
Lmao what?Rushing Yards Over Expected
Source: RYOE Calculator 1. This stat begins with Expected Rushing Yards. Expected Rushing Yards tells us how many rushing yards a ball-carrier is expected to gain on any given carry based on the location of the handoff, as well as the speed and direction of the blockers and defenders…
I am hoping that means more Fullback type plays(like the 9er's use) with a TE
playing fullback ,lead block role. as well as some misdirection that can be dialed up with
2 backs in the backfield.( Akers , Henderson)
Just glad McVay is focused on improving run game.
Yea I know. I mean how many man hours and expertise would it takeLmao what?
Sounds like the most BS star I’ve ever heard of.
I think advanced metrics like this are useful.. but using just one is problematic. (Not accusing, just discussing the tool)Yea I know. I mean how many man hours and expertise would it take
to actually come up with something accurate.
Probably not the best example I could have used for
a we need to improve run game post.