I think Saffold was an incentive laden contract (playing time?) so this may have been the best way for the Rams to make a point. They figured he could muddle through and come out of every game when he banged it again or shut him down for the season.
I believe I would plan for RS to be our top reliever for four OL starting positions. What I call our sixth OLer. I would plan to use him like this. You now have a veteran who can be plugged in at anytime without much of a decrease in production knowing full well that when the starter returns to health RS would hit the bench. Planning on RS to be anything else for you in your OL would not be smart......he has shown he is physically incapable to remain healthy and can not take the heavy pounding as an NFL starter. Thus his best planned position is Top Reliever. Garrett Reynolds may prove to be the better ORG over RS anyway.
Yes but when you look at the salary cap money spent on the OL it's very very low in comparison to most all other teams overall OL unit costs. Right now he is costing a bunch and he will not play another down this season.That's a pretty expensive backup isn't it?
Now, this is what I'm talking about...And the main reason I was hyped for him to make the 53....I figured we'd need him...Just not this soon....Now is the time to get our mauler primed and ready to be our future ORG. Cody Wichmann who is over 6'5 and 325 plus pounds ready to play!
When healthy I think he's above average, but I agree with the move on. If he goes on to be a stud elsewhere so be it.6M for a guy who has played 16 games in his career twice. Also a guy who will inevitably be injured at some point during the season. He's average when he's healthy. Just let him go and move on. The club had no problem ditching Incognito and he's talented! Saffold is injury prone and isn't a top G when healthy. He's the O line Drew Bennett, paid way too much for his services.