LesBaker
Mr. Savant
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2012
- Messages
- 17,460
- Name
- Les
I disagree on cutting Tavon. The amount we save is only 3 mill for cutting him and no way we go into FA/Draft/OTA's etc. without Demoff trying to drop that cap hit and fix that contract to a fitting amount that he would get elsewhere in the league.
I personally think Tavon's contract after restructure would be worth it on the extra guy he takes up being on the field meaning that Todd Gurley has one guy and maybe 2 guys he doesn't have to worry about. That for me is worth having him on the field.
And also consider this, almost every game we lost last year (5 of 6) was because we didn't do two things. Utilize Gurley, and Tavon had very little snaps on O. Regardless if it shows up on the stat sheet Tavon does create opportunities/space for the other players. That's a statistical fact, we just really to need fix the cap amount/hit of his contract which I'm damn certain they (demoff/Snead) are going to address.
Austin's value is downplayed by people looking at his stats.
In order to see his real value you also have to look at Gurley's stats.
When TA is on the field Gurley racks up more big plays and has a higher YPC by a significant margin.
Gurleys TD catch/run that put the Rams on top of the Cowboys is a perfect example. Austin froze 2 LB's long enough for TG to slip behind them into open space.
He may be overpaid, but he isn't without value and with McVay he is a piece on the chessboard.
No, I think he's going to be a Ram next year on the same contract. If he plays poorly, we'll cut him after 2018.
I've gone back and forth and I'm not sure what the Rams are going to do..........but I suspect he will be here next year at least.