-X-
Medium-sized Lebowski
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2010
- Messages
- 35,576
- Name
- The Dude
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:X said:UnknownREknown said:Wonder if Spags is going to get any consideration...
Agreed 100%The Dog said:I like Singetary's old school approach, think it serves well on the defensive side of the ball. I heard someone say he wasnt "visionary" but I dont think we need alot of new vision to assist my personal "see ball, go get ball" philosophy. I think the players would respond well to his style.
In the big picture, with all the leadership and experience we have in the cadre on that side of the ball....I dont see how we could go wrong.
Well, let's explore all possibilities then.mojorizen7 said:Agreed 100%The Dog said:I like Singetary's old school approach, think it serves well on the defensive side of the ball. I heard someone say he wasnt "visionary" but I dont think we need alot of new vision to assist my personal "see ball, go get ball" philosophy. I think the players would respond well to his style.
In the big picture, with all the leadership and experience we have in the cadre on that side of the ball....I dont see how we could go wrong.
As a DC? Yes and No. The 49ers used a 3-4/4-3 hybrid defense when he joined that team in 2007 (under Nolan), and he's coached 4-3 defenses as a LB coach (Ravens, Vikings). More importantly though, he's intimately familiar with the 4-6 and 4-3 (as a player) that Ditka and Landry employed. Ultimately, a good coach isn't limited by scheme though. This isn't something (IMO) that should be an issue for him.bluecoconuts said:Doesn't he run a 3-4? Has he ever coached a 4-3?
X said:Well, let's explore all possibilities then.mojorizen7 said:Agreed 100%The Dog said:I like Singetary's old school approach, think it serves well on the defensive side of the ball. I heard someone say he wasnt "visionary" but I dont think we need alot of new vision to assist my personal "see ball, go get ball" philosophy. I think the players would respond well to his style.
In the big picture, with all the leadership and experience we have in the cadre on that side of the ball....I dont see how we could go wrong.
Is he an astute X's and O's guy? Is he adept at situational playcalling? Is he good at adjusting on the fly and/or at halftime? We all know he can motivate players, and he doesn't take any shyte from divas, so that's great. But, how much do we really know about his strength as a playcaller and/or schemer?
X said:Is he an astute X's and O's guy? Is he adept at situational playcalling? Is he good at adjusting on the fly and/or at halftime? We all know he can motivate players, and he doesn't take any shyte from divas, so that's great. But, how much do we really know about his strength as a playcaller and/or schemer?
CGI_Ram said:This would be my concern/unknown with Singletary.
Coordinators are very cerebral positions, almost like chess players. Thinking ahead of the other guy. Strategic duel.
Which is why I might prefer a guy like Jauron. I'll take the quick thinker over the fire and brimstone on game day.
3 hours ago • By Jim ThomasX said:Well, let's explore all possibilities then.mojorizen7 said:Agreed 100%The Dog said:I like Singetary's old school approach, think it serves well on the defensive side of the ball. I heard someone say he wasnt "visionary" but I dont think we need alot of new vision to assist my personal "see ball, go get ball" philosophy. I think the players would respond well to his style.
In the big picture, with all the leadership and experience we have in the cadre on that side of the ball....I dont see how we could go wrong.
[hil]Is he an astute X's and O's guy?[/hil] Is he adept at situational playcalling? Is he good at adjusting on the fly and/or at halftime? We all know he can motivate players, and he doesn't take any shit from divas, so that's great. But, how much do we really know about his strength as a playcaller and/or schemer?