Really Happy With Rams QB Situation/Depth!

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
CGI_Ram

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
49,228
Name
Burger man
I'm excited by the fresh start with Foles.

Keenum; I am very lukewarm... And while I love Davis heart I do not like his arm.

Lastly; I am not interested in a 2-3rd round QB. We need those picks to be contributors - this year. If Foles doesn't get the job done I look to that draft for a real QB option.
 
Afro Ram

Afro Ram

Pro Bowler
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
1,041
Name
Mike
I like our QB situation. Going with vets as backups really hasn't gone anywhere. At least with the young blood we get to see if someone can develop into a solid 2nd stringer borderline/starter.

I would like to see the Rams extend Foles contract by about two seasons before the year begins. I think he's going to be in for a much bigger payday after the end of the year. (edit) Plus, I don't think the Rams will be in the market for a top tier QB anytime soon. Or at least they better not be.
 
Faceplant

Faceplant

Still celebrating Superbowl LVI
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 ROD Pick'em Champion
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
9,994
I have been watching some of the games from last year, and I mean to tell ya....Austin Davis has real potential. If he could keep the back breaking turnovers to a minimum, I really do think he could be a player at this level. Perfectly fine with him as a #2 if that is what he ends up. That is all....
 
VegasRam

VegasRam

Give your dog a hug.
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
3,931
Name
Doug
Faceplant said:
I have been watching some of the games from last year, and I mean to tell ya....Austin Davis has real potential. If he could keep the back breaking turnovers to a minimum, I really do think he could be a player at this level. Perfectly fine with him as a #2 if that is what he ends up. That is all....
Click to expand...

I agree. Don't care how long he's been in the league, he was (is) a raw rookie, playing against some pretty good D's. I also believe Hill really was injured.
They watched some film on him, and he just didn't have enough experience to counteract it. I also don't think Barks and Joseph helped matters.
Not saying he's a starter, but still has potential as a good back-up, and is certainly better than any rooks in this year's class, (#'s 1 and 2 excepted). I also think the WRs are significantly better now, and oh btw, the D wasn't stellar during his stint.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom