RamsJunkie
ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED!
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
- Messages
- 2,093
thanks for saving me 2 hours. i was debating watching it after said reviews on IMDB .Don't watch "The Babadook."
That movie, despite the good reviews, was boring as all hell.
I really wanted to like this movie but did not. I agree about the character development. It is sort of a crutch in my opinion when they want characters to seem "gritty" they give them over the top southern/hick accents.I watched "Fury" last night too. The WW2 movie starring Brad Pitt.
I don't even know what to think about it. The story was kind of rushed and poorly developed, and the character development was for crap, but when people get their legs and heads blown off by tank artillery, then I guess you forget about that stuff for a few minutes. It's your typical story of a group of guys who defy odds, receive incredible luck along the way, and then...
Everyone ends up dying except for one guy.
Right? WTF was that? Dude just watched like a hundred of his buddies get mowed down, and he figures, "Meh. He seems like a good guy and I'm pretty cool, so...."It also seemed odd the only piece of compassion displayed in the movie was from a SS soldier.
Nightcrawler.
Watch the crap out of this movie. Man was it good.
Jake Gyllenhaal plays a sociopath brilliantly, and the character development is off the charts.
It just seemed a very unrealistic and strange choice. So, the American soldiers were drunken rapists (in the French town) and the SS soldier was a nice guy. Of course in that kind of reality there are horrific and kind things done on all sides, just, I don't know what they were trying to say with that little scene.Right? WTF was that? Dude just watched like a hundred of his buddies get mowed down, and he figures, "Meh. He seems like a good guy and I'm pretty cool, so...."
I saw that too. This one is different, and IMO, better.The trailer reminds me of American Psycho, a film I do like, but because it does, I'm not interested in seeing it. Am I being unfair?
Yeah, there was a lot about that movie that I didn't like. I seemed like the writers just sat around and came up with individual ideas that they would incorporate into the script whether it had symmetry or not. And like you said, whether it made sense or not. But since every once in a while it had a cringe-worthy moment, they figured nobody would notice anything else. I will say that tank battle with the Panzer was pretty cool though.It just seemed a very unrealistic and strange choice. So, the American soldiers were drunken rapists (in the French town) and the SS soldier was a nice guy. Of course in that kind of reality there are horrific and kind things done on all sides, just, I don't know what they were trying to say with that little scene.
I agree that it really seemed to be a flimsy story built around action sequences, which is ok, but, the story should have some historic relevance if it is set in real life events. German high command was full of political appointees but German field Commodes generally were very good. The idea of just sending waves of men running blindly in to get gunned down by a guy....at times standing exposed on the back of a tank....is just silly. An tired 11 year old would come up with a better approach than that. But, whatever, the action scenes were shot well I thought.
Is there any Huey Lewis and the News music in it?I saw that too. This one is different, and IMO, better.
Yeah, that was pretty cool. It did have moments.Yeah, there was a lot about that movie that I didn't like. I seemed like the writers just sat around and came up with individual ideas that they would incorporate into the script whether it had symmetry or not. And like you said, whether it made sense or not. But since every once in a while it had a cringe-worthy moment, they figured nobody would notice anything else. I will say that tank battle with the Panzer was pretty cool though.
Those are my favorite scenes....where he talking about Huey Lewis and the News.....Hip to be SquareIs there any Huey Lewis and the News music in it?
Anarchist.Thanks to Netflix, I watched Hunger Games: Catching Fire without ever having seen the first one or read the books. I *think* I understood what was going on, and it was pretty good regardless of that.