Rams Stadium/Relocation Prospects Not As They Seem (101ESPN)

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

ShaneG

Starter
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
577
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #21
Re: Rams Stadium/Relocation Prospects Not As They Seem (101E

Tron said:
Amazing stuff as always Shane!!! Miss your B?R Rams Nuggets at noon. I'm Fitz btw if you remember. Great piece again man.

Thank you, Fitz. Great to hear from you again. Keep in touch! Hit me up on twitter sometime. :)
 

ShaneG

Starter
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
577
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #22
Re: Rams Stadium/Relocation Prospects Not As They Seem (101E

CGI_Ram said:
I finally got around to reading this piece... Well done. Not because the article favours STL, but because it's filled with logical arguments.

Solid work right there, Shane!

Thank you, CGI_Rams ... I greatly appreciate you sharing those comments.
 

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
Re: Rams Stadium/Relocation Prospects Not As They Seem (101E

SK is only interested in vertically integrated cash flows.

Which leaves one option.

STL.
 

Wonderboy

Rookie
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
246
Re: Rams Stadium/Relocation Prospects Not As They Seem (101E

Fantastic article! Really a first rate piece. Not only did I love the fact that it points out how obvious St. Louis is as the long term home of the Rams. But I also really appreciated the thoroughness of this article. Thanks for actually taking the time to research all of the flawed arguments for Los Angeles as a destination for the Rams (or any other current NFL franchise for that matter). Keep up the good work!
 

ShaneG

Starter
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
577
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #25
Re: Rams Stadium/Relocation Prospects Not As They Seem (101E

Wonderboy said:
Fantastic article! Really a first rate piece. Not only did I love the fact that it points out how obvious St. Louis is as the long term home of the Rams. But I also really appreciated the thoroughness of this article. Thanks for actually taking the time to research all of the flawed arguments for Los Angeles as a destination for the Rams (or any other current NFL franchise for that matter). Keep up the good work!

Thank you, Wonderboy. I really appreciate the detailed compliments on the report. I worked very hard on it and it always feels good when readers appreciate the effort. Thanks!
 

iced

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
6,620
Re: Rams Stadium/Relocation Prospects Not As They Seem (101E

Phenomenal article Shane.. Well thought out and articulated... I learned some new things from your article and got a better understanding of how the relocation fee's work..

I always felt the biggest reason Kroenke wouldn't move was because it just doesn't simply make any sense economically speaking, especially from a business perspective.
 

ShaneG

Starter
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
577
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #27
Re: Rams Stadium/Relocation Prospects Not As They Seem (101E

iced said:
Phenomenal article Shane.. Well thought out and articulated... I learned some new things from your article and got a better understanding of how the relocation fee's work..

I always felt the biggest reason Kroenke wouldn't move was because it just doesn't simply make any sense economically speaking, especially from a business perspective.

Thank you, iced. I really appreciate it! I agree with you re: business, at least as one of the major factors.