-And yes...bringing in some legit competition at Kicker. I brought this up last year too. Don't get mad Legatron fans
Yeah, GZ's numbers are still good, but God forbid he misses one and we NEED one late in the game. I worry about what i perceive to be his fragile confidence. He's hit some big kicks for us sure, but I'd like to see how he would perform in camp/preseason being pushed with some competition. It would be good for him IMO.
Since I answered this in another thread I will be the mad Legatron fan again here because there's no logic behind the criticisms at this point. You have to judge kickers on their body of work, not just one or two bad games. Yes, he caught a case of the yips in Washington, but it didn't ruin his career or confidence. He finished out the season perfect, 6-for-6.
In his short career GZ is 82% on field goals. That would place him 24th most accurate ALL-TIME. Above Jeff Wilkins. The very best kickers hit 89%. That means the difference between the most accurate kickers that have ever lived and GZ is one miss out of 20 attempts. And based on GZ's 92% of 2013 and his young age, it's more likely GZ gets better, not worse, and moves up this list.
There's also the distance you have to factor in with these accuracy numbers. One quarter of GZ's attempts are beyond 50 yards. This stat would take time to research, but I'm willing to bet that GZ's average attempt distance is #1 in NFL history. Janikowski is at 19% over 50. GZ tried 7 deep kicks last season compared Gostkowski's grand total of one (1) out of his 37 attempts last season.
So GZ is kicking at a high standard for his career on a much more difficult handicap than most other kickers due to this distance factor. As far as the worry about "one kick losing a close game": (1) again the logic is wrong to focus on one game because anything can happen on a sample size of 1; and (2) if we turn the logic on its head there's no other kicker you should want if you are worried about your kicker winning one game.
First, examples of the problems with attaching too much emotion on the "one kick deciding a game" are Scott Norwood's wide right. A year later Norwood was 4-4 in the playoffs and kicked the FG that made the difference in a 10-7 win in the AFC Championship, sending the Bills back to the Super Bowl. The bigger problem for Norwood was his overall body of work, not one infamous kick.
Another one game example is Gary Anderson's missed FG in the 1998 NFC Championship. It was a 38-yard chip shot for Anderson. Talk about confidence -- Anderson had been absolutely perfect the whole season, 100%. And yet when it all mattered, he missed. The moral of course is luck is king in the sample size of 1, no matter who is kicking. It's not a logical basis to use to replace GZ.
Second, your logic should be turned on its head and realize that there's no better kicker in the NFL suited to be *the guy* you want to make that one kick because GZ's leg strength gives the Rams options other teams don't have. What if the drive stalls at the 40-yard line with 3 seconds left? The Rams could send in GZ for the 57-yarder where for his career he's got a 59% chance to win it. Some teams don't have a kicker that can kick it that far so their chance is 0%. The Seahawks could send in Hauschka for his worse 53% chance, but more likely would take their chances on a Fail Mary (100% success).
The only logical complaint about GZ at this point is his kickoffs are too boom or bust. He's #1 in kickoff distance in the NFL yet just over half are touchbacks, that should be higher. And when he miss hits one it leads to a too good of a return. Obviously much of that blame lies on the coverage unit (I'm still angry over the botched outside contain v. KC).
As far as camp competition, I think the Rams always bring in a second camp kicker. I think this year it's Michael Palardy. But GZ doesn't need to be pushed in competition, everything about him screams an intense desire to keep improving, and I think he will have a great year and make these complaints look silly.