Alan
Legend
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2013
- Messages
- 9,766
Abbot and Costello were great. I grew up with them.flv with this:
It's a guess. In addition to Barksdale we got a good year out of Turner at C & LG in 2012. We had a decent year from Richardson at RT in 2012. We had better performances from Shelley Smith than you could reasonably expect from a FA. Williams was poor for us but we got more out of him than the Bears did. Boudreau has had finished vets and some rags to work with. Expecting improvements in Wells and Long was unrealistic. Expecting more from cast-offs was probably unrealistic too. It's hard to tell what he achieves with late round picks and un-drafted rookies because they haven't stayed healthy. I can't identify a good player deteriorating from a technical standpoint to demonstrate him failing. Wells might be that guy but i'm more inclined to put that down to health. I have to give Boudreau a pass or at least a non-failing grade for coaching.
Again it's a guess but when it comes to talent evaluation and personnel decisions i'm on the other side of the equation. Giving Smith a 4th year had to be on Boudreau. Playing Ojinakka had to be on Boudreau. All our signings look like Olympic athletes rather than OL from around the league so i'd guess the decisions were all made by the same person. If so tough call for Fisher to overrule him if he says Wells and Joseph are the best we have.
It's all a guess. None of us knows what really goes on. Personally i've have Boudreau a bit in the red. Whoosh! There goes the bus. I think the personnel decisions have hurt us more than the coaching has helped us. I didn't call for either of our coordinator's heads so I certainly won't be calling for his head. Ultimately it's all on Fisher. If he picks Boudreau then in Boudreau we trust.
Anecdotally I love the 'Who's on First' sketch. I used it when I spammed NFL.com. 105 posts on 2000+ otherwise unused boards. Well it killed an hour and it didn't do any harm.
Saying a guy who didn't cause anyone's play to deteriorate is doing a good coaching job is setting a pretty low bar isn't it?
I kind of forgot to add a paragraph in my last post. It's that time of night. I agree with you about the stubbornness. I just don't which one it is. Maybe it's both of them cause you know, they're both old like me. We all know how stubborn old guys get.
My bottom line with Bou is that while I don't see anything to get excited about with him. I also don't see any reason to replace him either. But and it's a big but, either he can't coach up the guys we have (which begs the question of why we have them in the first place) to replace the likes of Wells and Joseph or he has coached them up and we already had better options. But if that's true then Bou is letting Fisher completely disregard his advice or he's the one being stubborn about using the vets. I know that most would think that Fish is the boss but why would he micromanage down to that level? Who would know who is better than the O-line coach?