It'd be a pointless excursion. Why would you make a hole and ruin the cohesion of a line that already has troubles keeping your QB up for a player that relies heavily on said QB staying up?Hypothetical situation, in no way endorsing it, donning my flame retardant suit:
Could you trade Greg Robinson for a #1 WR at this point in his career?
It'd be a pointless excursion. Why would you make a hole and ruin the cohesion of a line that already has troubles keeping your QB up for a player that relies heavily on said QB staying up?
It's kind of like trading your jalopy for only the keys of a Ferrari.
Only one I can see is Chicago, because they're in firesale mode and need O-line like a burning, but those others have perfectly fine O-line play and would have no reason to trade for a LT to begin with, let alone GRob.Sure, but that's not what I asked. I asked if another team in the league would trade a legit #1 WR for Greg Robinson.
Would Houston trade DeAndre Hopkins for Robinson?
Pittsburgh and Antonio Brown?
Denver and Demarius Thomas?
Giants and ODB?
Chicago and Alshon?
Oakland for Cooper?
Its just an example. I wonder what people think about that
Sure, but that's not what I asked. I asked if another team in the league would trade a legit #1 WR for Greg Robinson.
Would Houston trade DeAndre Hopkins for Robinson?
Pittsburgh and Antonio Brown?
Denver and Demarius Thomas?
Giants and ODB?
Chicago and Alshon?
Oakland for Cooper?
Its just an example. I wonder what people think about that
I think it's a fair question, but I wouldn't do it, if I were the Rams. If I was the other team, I'd only do it, if the need was great, and I had two #1 receivers.Sure, but that's not what I asked. I asked if another team in the league would trade a legit #1 WR for Greg Robinson.
Would Houston trade DeAndre Hopkins for Robinson?
Pittsburgh and Antonio Brown?
Denver and Demarius Thomas?
Giants and ODB?
Chicago and Alshon?
Oakland for Cooper?
Its just an example. I wonder what people think about that
Moving Robinson into a 3rd position in less than 18 months is not the way to do things.
I'm reading all the posts in this thread and about 2/3 of the way through them I had to go back and make sure we were talking about a practice squad player.
Moving Robinson into a 3rd position in less than 18 months is not the way to do things.
I'm reading all the posts in this thread and about 2/3 of the way through them I had to go back and make sure we were talking about a practice squad player.
I was hopeful when we drafted him too. But I'm going to wait a couple more weeks until I pencil him in as GR's replacement. :rolllaugh:Akrasian excited about the future:
Heh. Yeah. I like him. I think there's a good chance he'll be a solid or better starter - eventually.
Much less the PS. But I like the optimism being exhibited by many of our posters. When I came back I knew we'd played some stinkers and I thought that might have taken the wind out of a lot of poster's sails. It's a much better attitude than I thought it would be.blue4 with a gift for understatement:
I'd have to guess that any player good enough to force them to move GRob isn't on the roster. Yet.