Rodgers was in full control of that game. But no worries on the disagreement and I wish the Rams had made the plays they had themselves in position to make.Totally disagree respectfully.
The game was won in the trenches.
The difference between the Olines was night and day.
Goff had guys running free at him all game due to Evans and Blythe.
Rodgers had 0 sacks and maybe 1 legit pressure all game. Not to mention all 3 GB RB’s were running for big chunks all game.
Rodgers had the game on a silver platter given to him and still nearly threw 3 picks.
So score would have been 29-18?Rodgers threw two balls that should have been picked off in the first half.
Would have made a difference.
Also Troy Hill had a terrible game. Maybe not easy to replace but easy to not overpay.So score would have been 29-18?
Not likelySo score would have been 29-18?
Not likely
it was a one possession game for a long stretch although many are crestfallen as though it was a blowout...overreactions tend toward prevalence
We had a chance if Reynolds catches the ball. How many times this year had Goff leading us back from behind only to have a receiver drop an easy ball that critically put us into a bad situation.Yeah but the very first drive of the 2nd half the d opened up faster than a hooker's legs after a john hands her a hundred.
And what would a comeback by the Rams be without either Reynolds or Everett dropping a very easy catchable ball during a drive? I'm so sick of seeing them on the team. The thing was Reynolds stepped up during the game and made some plays and then undid it all by dropping another ball when the Rams really needed him to make the catch. So frustrating.
.