.
just to add, the owners opted out of the cba back in 2008 because they thought they gave too much of a cut to the players. so when they finally agreed on an amount the players were getting 2% less than they were in the cba before the owners opted out of it.
does that look like the owners want to spend more money on players?
.
just to add, the owners opted out of the cba back in 2008 because they thought they gave too much of a cut to the players. so when they finally agreed on an amount the players were getting 2% less than they were in the cba before the owners opted out of it.
does that look like the owners want to spend more money on players?
.