You make some good points.
Glennon was handed the TB job twice lost it twice. Had about the same stats than Davis, yet had better WR's and arguably better protection. he makes poor decisions with the ball and has accuracy issues.
Given time yeah maybe he he can be a quality backup, and I'd consider him as a backup if he could beat out Davis.
But compete against Bradford, that's DOA..
Glennon was not handed the TB job this year. McCown got hurt. If it was a real competition, Glennon would have won the job. He outplayed McCown.
As far as the first time he was handed the job, he had good rookie year. And then the new staff came in.
So no, I don't agree he lost it twice. IMO, he didn't even truly lose it once. He should have started over McCown this year.
And I'm not sure where the compete against Bradford line is coming from. I didn't say that. Unless you're responding to another poster(if so, my apologies for misunderstanding). I mean, he'd obviously compete with Sam...but he wouldn't beat him out.
Stats may have been similar to Davis but his play was not. It was far better.
So if he has the kind of potential to be as good a backup as
@jrry32 thinks he does, why would they trade him for a song when we all know how important the backup QB position is?
Already have McCown and they're getting offered a draft pick for a player that won't start for them. I guess I'm hoping they would. I think it's likely they would, though. No reason to hold onto Glennon to be a 3rd string QB.