Potential WR Trade Targets

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
If Daniels was showing out, wouldn't he be playing more? It didn't take long for Puka and Kupp to get on the field as rookies and make big impacts. WR is the one offensive position McVay will actually play a rookie at lol.
So, we're comparing Daniels to Puka and Kupp now?
The only two WRs to immediately get on the field with significant playing time for McVay have been elite of the elite guys that at one point were considered the best WR in the NFL.

I like Daniels, but don't think it's fair to put him in that category.
 
  • Cheers
Reactions: Ramstien
Well to be fair, Puka opened the season with Playing time due to injuries, who's to say what what have happened had he began the season on ice like recent rookies have been
Puka was injured earlier this year. Davante is currently injured. Daniels has yet to make an impact. Maybe that changes in the coming weeks, but I can't say I'm comfortable putting all my eggs in the Daniels basket before he has shown anything in real games.
So, we're comparing Daniels to Puka and Kupp now?
The only two WRs to immediately get on the field for McVay have been elite of the elite guys that at one point were considered the best WR in the NFL.

I like Daniels, but don't think it's fair to put him in that category.
No, I'm using them as examples to illustrate that McVay will actually play rookie WRs if they're ready to make an immediate impact. Van Jefferson also got some early PT as a rookie.
 
Puka was injured earlier this year. Davante is currently injured. Daniels has yet to make an impact. Maybe that changes in the coming weeks, but I can't say I'm comfortable putting all my eggs in the Daniels basket before he has shown anything in real games.

No, I'm using them as examples to illustrate that McVay will actually play rookie WRs if they're ready to make an immediate impact. Van Jefferson also got some early PT as a rookie.
I know you were using it as an example. I was saying in response, that the only guys who got significant playing time as rookies, and who made an immediate impact, were those two elite guys. None of the others got much playing time or made an impact.
 
I know you were using it as an example. I was saying in response, that the only guys who got significant playing time as rookies, and who made an immediate impact, were those two elite guys. None of the others got much playing time or made an impact.
None of the others turned into impactful WRs either. Van Jefferson and Josh Reynolds are the next best WRs after Puka and Kupp.
 
  • Cheers
Reactions: DzRams
Cant make this up
It's only "coach speak" when it doesnt support someone's narrative
I'll take his word for it, it's not like he hasnt been brutally honest in the past.
"He's our quarterback right now" ring a bell?
My take is he can't be happy with the output of his wr3 and 4 so far. While he is saying he is happy, he is also saying Daniels will get an opportunity. He generally goes with experience. We all know this. So while they might not be looking to make a trade for a WR, it is obvious he is looking further down his depth chart for some answers. You have been around long enough to know that head coaches are careful with what they say. The Rams have been really good about keeping things in house. Also McVay has mentioned many times that he regrets how the Goff thing all went down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: El Chapo Jr
None of the others turned into impactful WRs either. Van Jefferson and Josh Reynolds are the next best WRs after Puka and Kupp.
Right…. So.. when they are good, they play.
When they’re not good, they don’t play.

Even moderately good previous players had significantly more impact than Mumpfield and Whitt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: majrleaged
Yeah, if Daniels becomes that caliber of player, we've done well with a 6th round pick.
Reynolds was active 16 games as a rookie and ended up with 24 targets on a team with Cooper Kupp, Woods, Watkins, Higbee, Everett & Gurley. Beat out Pharoah Cooper, Mike Thomas & Tavon Austin.

If he was that good.. he’d have beaten out everyone else.
 
Yes because where a guy was drafted is such a key component for a guy’s NFL success and LT career. Especially after several years in the nfl.
Eye roll
So.. about the actually player performance and what it says about talent.

Oh.. Reynolds’s is STILL playing.
 
He was drafted three rounds higher, andin his second season had 29 catches on 53 targets with 5 TDs and 400 yards.
Yeah, I know but in his 3rd season, he only had 300 yards. I'm not seeing a huge difference despite the higher draft pedigree.

I never thought we'd see the day we're pining for a Reynolds. Trust me, someone of his caliber won't be the savior of the offense or season.
 
Yeah, I know but in his 3rd season, he only had 300 yards. I'm not seeing a huge difference despite the higher draft pedigree.

I never thought we'd see the day we're pining for a Reynolds. Trust me, someone of his caliber won't be the savior of the offense or season.
1- I didn’t call him a savior, did anyone else? This was in response to someone asking if we are overrating Reynolds in comparison to Mumpfield.

2-5 TDs.. 400 yards Mumpfield on pace for 300 yards & 2 tds. And 10 more receptions. And that was with more competition for targets.

Oh.. and others have repeatedly stated Stafford likes bigger targets.. Reynolds is 6-4 to Mumps 5-11
 
  • Like
Reactions: El Chapo Jr
Reynolds was active 16 games as a rookie and ended up with 24 targets on a team with Cooper Kupp, Woods, Watkins, Higbee, Everett & Gurley. Beat out Pharoah Cooper, Mike Thomas & Tavon Austin.

If he was that good.. he’d have beaten out everyone else.
I'm not sure why you responded to my post with this point.
 

Mumpfield said that he'll catch 6 asses just for you, Den. ;)
meh chris geere GIF by You're The Worst