Poll: Dickerson or Faulk?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Dickerson or Faulk?

  • Dickerson

    Votes: 19 29.7%

  • Faulk

    Votes: 39 60.9%

  • Someone else

    Votes: 1 1.6%

  • Depends on the QB

    Votes: 1 1.6%

  • Boffo, you heartless monster, are you going to make me choose between my children next?!

    Votes: 4 6.3%
  • Total voters
    64
Footy said:
Without a doubt one dimensional. Run catch and block. ED ran great. Only that. Woulda coulda doesn't cut it. MF did it all and MF helped win it all.
Click to expand...
Wow. You sure did learn a lot for someone who just became a Rams fan on October 28, 2012.
BRB. I have a squeaky wheel on my car. I think the axle needs some grease.
I'm not that mechanically inclined though, so I might take it to Stan ... my mechanic.
 
-X- said:
Wow. You sure did learn a lot for someone who just became a Rams fan on October 28, 2012.
BRB. I have a squeaky wheel on my car. I think the axle needs some grease.
I'm not that mechanically inclined though, so I might take it to Stan ... my mechanic.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't do that, X. Stan takes a personal enjoyment in causing car Rex. Then your squeaky wheel and grease-less axle will be the least of your concerns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: -X-
Memento said:
I wouldn't do that, X. Stan takes a personal enjoyment in causing car Rex. Then your squeaky wheel and grease-less axle will be the least of your concerns.
Click to expand...
He better not. He'll suffer the Wrath of this Rams fan if he does.

(lol. How many people other than a few of us are in total darkness over this exchange?)
 
-X- said:
He better not. He'll suffer the Wrath of this Rams fan if he does.

(lol. How many people other than a few of us are in total darkness over this exchange?)
Click to expand...

(Uh...I'd say at least two-thirds of the board.)
 
Are we just Italicizing and Capitalizing random Words?
 
-X- said:
Wow. You sure did learn a lot for someone who just became a Rams fan on October 28, 2012.
BRB. I have a squeaky wheel on my car. I think the axle needs some grease.
I'm not that mechanically inclined though, so I might take it to Stan ... my mechanic.
Click to expand...

Don't forget Rex, your idol.:p
 
-X- said:
He better not. He'll suffer the Wrath of this Rams fan if he does.

(lol. How many people other than a few of us are in total darkness over this exchange?)
Click to expand...

That darkness is a stain upon your heart.o_O
 
-X- said:
He better not. He'll suffer the Wrath of this Rams fan if he does.

(lol. How many people other than a few of us are in total darkness over this exchange?)
Click to expand...

24qnxir.jpg
 
In this era of football: Faulk and I don't think twice.

20 years ago I'd go ED.

It's a different game these days.
 
Yeah. Tough crowd.

Besides the fact that Dickerson didn't really have a QB worth his weight from 83-86 (Everett was a rookie in 86), the Rams' passing game was almost non-existent. They were nearly 1-dimensional. If the defense got burned, the Rams had trouble coming back. Faulk had Warner. Faulk was an astonishing talent, but he did have a QB. Dickerson was the Rams offense.

There was also no FA at all. Teams had all the power. There was no CBA to give ED an option to do anything other than hold out. The NFLPA had to decertify, IIRC, sometime in the late 80's to get the NFL to the bargaining table. And these were Georgia's Rams, run by Shaw. In those days, the Rams were an accessory for Georgia.

Dickerson knew what he was worth to the team--sans a decent QB--but he wasn't going to get it without putting pressure on the FO. Different era.

If Dickerson had arrived in 93, when the first CBA was signed, he probably would have been a Ram for life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WillasDad and RamFan503
Ram Quixote said:
Yeah. Tough crowd.

Besides the fact that Dickerson didn't really have a QB worth his weight from 83-86 (Everett was a rookie in 86), the Rams' passing game was almost non-existent. They were nearly 1-dimensional. If the defense got burned, the Rams had trouble coming back. Faulk had Warner. Faulk was an astonishing talent, but he did have a QB. Dickerson was the Rams offense.

There was also no FA at all. Teams had all the power. There was no CBA to give ED an option to do anything other than hold out. The NFLPA had to decertify, IIRC, sometime in the late 80's to get the NFL to the bargaining table. And these were Georgia's Rams, run by Shaw. In those days, the Rams were an accessory for Georgia.

Dickerson knew what he was worth to the team--sans a decent QB--but he wasn't going to get it without putting pressure on the FO. Different era.

If Dickerson had arrived in 93, when the first CBA was signed, he probably would have been a Ram for life.
Click to expand...
Great points and totally on the mark.
 
This is sad to say, but there is no doubt in my mind that had ED played for any of several other teams (Cowboys, Niners, Giants, Redskins, Broncos, etc.), we'd be talking about a household name on par with the likes of Walter Payton, Jim Brown, or even Bo Jackson. The Rams upper management really messed up on this one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back