- Joined
- Jun 18, 2014
- Messages
- 4,935
1) It's PFF. I don't pay attention to them when they praise the Rams, I don't pay attention to them otherwise
2) How did they account for the QB situation?
3) It's PFF.
4) They rip on Kendricks, without realizing that he had a mangled thumb much of the season, making it rather difficult to catch. That is their usual level of accuracy.
5) See #4. It's PFF.
6) Half the players haven't played yet. How can they evaluate them?
7) They think Quick is going to be the #3 guy. The only way that happens is if he is productive, at least as much as pre-injury in 2014. Otherwise he's likely gone, and a more productive rookie will be getting the targets.
8) It's PFF.
9) I'm glad the article was posted instead of a link, because it's yet another example of PFF's clickbait.
2) How did they account for the QB situation?
3) It's PFF.
4) They rip on Kendricks, without realizing that he had a mangled thumb much of the season, making it rather difficult to catch. That is their usual level of accuracy.
5) See #4. It's PFF.
6) Half the players haven't played yet. How can they evaluate them?
7) They think Quick is going to be the #3 guy. The only way that happens is if he is productive, at least as much as pre-injury in 2014. Otherwise he's likely gone, and a more productive rookie will be getting the targets.
8) It's PFF.
9) I'm glad the article was posted instead of a link, because it's yet another example of PFF's clickbait.