theramsruleUK
Pro Bowler
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,079
As in "Barksdale must have been smoking pot to think he would get a huge contract this offseason"?
I see what you did there
As in "Barksdale must have been smoking pot to think he would get a huge contract this offseason"?
They did have him scheduled for a visit!I haven't read anything regarding the Rams leaning towards selecting Peat.
Forget the alliteration, the first half title had me thinking of scotch for a second and I thought that had to be on purpose.Anyone thinking we're trying to get a deal with Barks done before the draft, and using a perceived preference for Peat (dig that alliteration, baby!) as leverage?
I do have a big ol' bottle of this stuff at home, and even an empty glass that recently held it will fill the room with a wonderful smell of peat:Forget the alliteration, the first half title had me thinking of scotch for a second and I thought that had to be on purpose.
Well played.
..............- Peat is basically a tackle and only a tackle
- Someone like Scherff would likely be flexible enough to be a guard, which doesn't necessarily solve RT and leaves us still in the position of needing Barksdale more than he needs us
- Fisher has publicly committed to Robinson at LT, so publicly at least, the Peat choice would be for RT and RT only.........
I'm mostly talking about the public perception that Barksdale is hearing. "We're committed to Robinson at LT" + Peat isn't really going to be moving to G = Peat on the Rams is a RT.I sure do not see Peat as just a ORT & RT only. I see Peat as both OLT & ORT. Sure Fisher has declared Greg Robinson his starting OLT & I agree but Fisher has a history of changing his mind from time to time. While Fisher may have a solid OLT candidate in GR what he does not have is a back up or a swing OT on his roster. In fact Fisher does not have a legit starting ORT either. Fisher does have Garrett Reynolds as a reserve ORG/ORT but he is far from being looked at as a starting ORT.
Now I know the Rams do not have any history of OLT going down to injury in the last decade. alm: But I would suggest that Fisher try to seriously try to find a solution @ starting ORT....Barksdale is NO solution just a stop gap. I would also hope he finally finds a replacement for Wayne Hunter who was our last legit swing OT ....and that was in 2012.
I'm mostly talking about the public perception that Barksdale is hearing. "We're committed to Robinson at LT" + Peat isn't really going to be moving to G = Peat on the Rams is a RT.
Forget the alliteration, the first half title had me thinking of scotch for a second and I thought that had to be on purpose.
Well played.
Yeah, I've only had one glass of that, at a bar somewhere, and I do remember thinking that it was probably the best I'd had at the time.Ever try Talisker?? If you love a smoky single malt, this is the I've had. (imo) Cheers!
Something about Peat...Just doesn't scream Pace? It screams Alex Barron...I question his toughness too..Just not a dominant type player for his size & experience. So, I agree with this so much....I don't like Peat and hope that the is not the pick at ten. He is has all the tools but I don't think he played like he did. Some question his toughness. That does not sound like a Fisher player to me. I think they go with a mean run blocking type.
Exactly.....I believe several rookies could play to the level Joe displayed last year. I can't believe a bunch of guys here in ROD don't realize how difficult it is to play poorly in a contract year. That is a huge sign....We sign him now, that is surrendering to me.Or they could get a first round ORT and then why pay Barksdale when a first round talent would most likely be better than Joe right out of the chute.
I agree with everything (or at least I see it as a strong possibility) you said in your post.BonifayRam still not happy with our O-line:
Fisher does have Garrett Reynolds as a reserve ORG/ORT but he is far from being looked at as a starting ORT.
But I would suggest that Fisher try to seriously try to find a solution @ starting ORT....
GR-Cann-Rhaney-Saffold-CollinsLACHAMP46 oh so close:
G-Rob-Cann-Rhaney-Saffold-Flowers
my dream line.....
SEC guy, hmmm...I can't complain, Collins is my second choice, but I'd move him to:GR-Cann-Rhaney-Saffold-Collins
LACHAMP46 with a ringer:
SEC guy, hmmm...I can't complain, Collins is my second choice, but I'd move him to:
GR_Collins_Rhaney_Saffold_Donovan SMITH
My money is on Collins - to quote nil.com - "Collins plays with a mean streak that is evident in every game, and could come in and start right away in a power-running game" sounds like a Fisher type player If we get Barks back, start him at RT, Collins as our RG, Jones as our Centre
Our o-line could be:
Robinson, Saffold, Jones, Collins, Barksdale - I'd be happy with that - or
Robinson, Jones, Rhaney, Saffold, Collins - I'd also be happy with that