LesBaker said:
Ram Quixote said:
bluecoconuts said:
The arrest warrant is for obstruction of justice it seems. Stupid stupid.
Just wondering ... what's the difference between not incriminating yourself and destroying evidence?
If Hernandez is guilty I don't want him getting off. And yet, his home surveillance equipment and cell phone are his possessions. It was quite artless of him to be so blatant about the destruction. Makes him really look bad. BUT I wonder if I wouldn't have done something similar in the same situation. More subtly of course.
A gun can be a possession and be used in a robbery and it become evidence because it was used in a crime. The phone and surveillance equipment have info that can be used to potentially prove a crime was committed and tampering with them is a crime in and of itself. I believe the law views those two things the same way essentially. Part of the crime and investigation of the crime. They will be tacking on some additional obstruction of justice charges as well.
I'd guess there are fines and probably a year in jail for each charge. Probably somewhere around the type of fines and punishment for perjury I'd suppose.
Y'but Les it's not really the charge he'll be prosecuted for.
If he is charged with that and so far it doesn't seem the reports are accurate that he is charged, I'd say it's in order to get him into custody so he can't interfere with any more of the investigation.
If he isn't at least charged as an accomplice ,I don't see that what he's done IS criminal.