- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 30,491
I don't think they ever won a bowl with him either, though.
Green Bay sure did.
I don't think they ever won a bowl with him either, though.
And a true NT and a legitimate 3/4 OLB to replace Quinn.Yes. But for the run defense to function, we need our CBs healthy.
And a true NT and a legitimate 3/4 OLB to replace Quinn.
Nah. We can stop the run this year with our unit if we have our starting CBs. We were doing it against Minnesota. Problem is that we need that extra safety in the box.
I don't know why this has turned into another "get rid of Donald" thread, but I've spent more than enough time on this topic. I'm not going to bother going into detail anymore because these conversations don't ever lead anywhere productive.
We do not have the talent to support a 3 - 4 defense.
You, once again turned it into another "pay Donald whatever he wants" thread ... which is a bad plan. And anyone who thinks differently than you on this you attack and act like it's beneath you to talk about it because they don't agree with you. Not cool.![]()
I see a CB being drafted early, a NT signed in FA, and OLBs from both. This D is close to being very good. Obviously, we have to shore up those gash rushing plays we like to give up early in games and get a little more pressure on the QB on a consistent basis. But do we have any complaints on how we did Brees? I'd hope not because he was under duress for most of the game this week. Like already stated, we don't have a lot of depth (or none) on the back end of the D.