Alarming, in that Dan O is Stafford's BIGGEST Defender.
View: https://x.com/danorlovsky7/status/2112643080830472197
View: https://x.com/danorlovsky7/status/2112643080830472197
Alarming, in that Dan O is Stafford's BIGGEST Defender.
View: https://x.com/danorlovsky7/status/2112643080830472197
Alarming, in that Dan O is Stafford's BIGGEST Defender.
View: https://x.com/danorlovsky7/status/2112643080830472197
Agreed!It's easy to point fingers when the team is down. And let's not forget Stafford has had basically only 1 wide receiver all year long. And his best receiving tight ends have also been hurt. Too early to give up on HOFer Stafford.
The point is, Orlovsky has NEVER pointed the finger at Stafford in the past, NE-VERRR.It's easy to point fingers when the team is down. And let's not forget Stafford has had basically only 1 wide receiver all year long. And his best receiving tight ends have also been hurt. Too early to give up on HOFer Stafford.
So is Stafford not making more mistakes than he made last year or is he the exact same? If we make excuses for everything, we eliminate all potential reasons we're 2-4.I mean yeah staford is not playing as well..but this is nothing
You could find multiple instances of every qb in the nfl every week not seeing wide open recievers.
Love love LOVE Laura Rutledge. Good looking, funny, sunny disposition, and knows football. THE PERFECT WOMAN!The truth is the truth.
Also that blonde. Hello Clarice.
Its obvious he isnt playing as well. Someone pointing out open receivers missed however is amateur hour as it happens most pass plays.So is Stafford not making more mistakes than he made last year or is he the exact same? If we make excuses for everything, we eliminate all potential reasons we're 2-4.
Its obvious he isnt playing as well. Someone pointing out open receivers missed however is amateur hour as it happens most pass plays.
Dont start diving into strawmans however..because of course there are many reasons we have lost games this year that are easy to take note of.
The denial in this fan base is strong as it pertains to the truth. But once again...
Matthew Stafford is 38 years old. Since 1950 only 18 QBs in league history have made it to their 38th year as starter. That's roughly a 3% rate.
The Rams are 2-4 with him at starting QB.
The Rams are 4 games behind division leader SF with only 6 games played.
The Rams offense is 20th in scoring. They are a bottom third offense.
The Rams drafted a QB 13th overall this past draft. I thought he was a reach. But the Rams identified and desired him there and he looked like he worked hard to learn the offense in preseason.
Stafford is ranked 17th in passer rating. He is not seeing the field well. He is missing open receivers.
McVay is the only coach in modern history (that I can think of) who moved a starting QB that took his team to a Super Bowl, in Jared Goff. He has the highest of standards in his QBs.
If you think Stafford is safe right now, you haven't been paying attention to the league at large as it pertains to old QBs, nor McVay in how he handles his QBs.
I'm not thinking much will change this year, but if Stafford were to continue on his current trajectory, it will affect whether he's back next year.Stafford is in absolutely zero danger of losing his job unless he plays like he did in week 1 for a month straight. And in that case, Stetson would be the one to get the shot. There are all kind of metrics that show the offense near the top of the league as well. And to your point, there are more instances of 38 year old QBs playing winning football this century than there are examples of first round QBs with fewer than 15 collegiate starts working out.