lockdnram21
Legend
Would we really? He was the 33rd pick in the draft and not to break the 40 catch mark in 3 years in the league would be a major disappointment.
not really as long as hes consistent and makes plays when hes called on .
Would we really? He was the 33rd pick in the draft and not to break the 40 catch mark in 3 years in the league would be a major disappointment.
Baby steps... baby steps... pretty much have to write off the first two years... as sad as that is to digest.
Quicks inconsistency is going to land him behind Britt, Austin, Pettis, Givens, and Bailey. Guy may be our healthy scratch. Discouraging to hear he is still inconsistent.
Would we really? He was the 33rd pick in the draft and not to break the 40 catch mark in 3 years in the league would be a major disappointment.
Quicks inconsistency is going to land him behind Britt, Austin, Pettis, Givens, and Bailey. Guy may be our healthy scratch. Discouraging to hear he is still inconsistent.
So you focus on the comment about the drop, but seem to TOTALLY disregard the comment about the "bounced back with a couple of CONTESTED CATCHES AFTER."
We get that you don't think much of him. But at least be fair in your commentary.
You are putting way too much into this OTA report from a guy that has seen him for what 2 1hour sessions?? He was said to have that VJ potential and he does have the body and has shown the flash as you said. He is in the 3 year of his rookie contract, a guy who came from div 2. He did not get to play the whole year with Bradford last year. He is progressing if you listen to his coaches and team mates. THOSE are the opinions I care about, those are the guys who know what is going on. If he was a bust who did not work hard we would already know about it. Most guys from div 1 don't progress any better, you are being to critical and basing it on very little.Being inconsistent is the epitome of what Quick has been for us. A flash play here or there, then relegated to mental mistakes and just flat disappears on us. I think the inconsistency in OTAs isn't a good thing because it's just a continuation of his previous 2 years. This guy was billed as the next TO when drafted. He was billed as Vincent Jackson. He has to step up at some point. He needs to bring it, even in OTAs.
I didn't focus on the drop. I focused on Wagoner's description of Quick being inconsistent. His words not mine. I'm not at OTAs so I don't know if that's accurate or not. I just really want Quick to step up. We need him to. He was billed as a potential top end starting WR, right now he is in a fight to even get on the field.So you focus on the comment about the drop, but seem to TOTALLY disregard the comment about the "bounced back with a couple of CONTESTED CATCHES AFTER."
We get that you don't think much of him. But at least be fair in your commentary.
I'm basing it off of 2 years and from Wagoner it doesn't sound like much has changed. Sorry to say that. He was picked at 33 and a 33rd overall pick should be contributing in his 3rd year no matter what school he is from. Sorry to sound harsh on the guy, but it's reality. He needs to play better consistently and produce. Anybody here satisfied with what we got out of him?You are putting way too much into this OTA report from a guy that has seen him for what 2 1hour sessions?? He was said to have that VJ potential and he does have the body and has shown the flash as you said. He is in the 3 year of his rookie contract, a guy who came from div 2. He did not get to play the whole year with Bradford last year. He is progressing if you listen to his coaches and team mates. THOSE are the opinions I care about, those are the guys who know what is going on. If he was a bust who did not work hard we would already know about it. Most guys from div 1 don't progress any better, you are being to critical and basing it on very little.
I don't think anyone is satisfied with what we've seen so far, but most don't want to give up on him just yet, and I think that's where the coaches are too.I'm basing it off of 2 years and from Wagoner it doesn't sound like much has changed. Sorry to say that. He was picked at 33 and a 33rd overall pick should be contributing in his 3rd year no matter what school he is from. Sorry to sound harsh on the guy, but it's reality. He needs to play better consistently and produce. Anybody here satisfied with what we got out of him?
I don't want to give up on him either, but he has to step up this year. I don't like hearing that he is still inconsistent in practice. We need this guy to step it up.I don't think anyone is satisfied with what we've seen so far, but most don't want to give up on him just yet, and I think that's where the coaches are too.
After this year, *IF* he doesn't produce, it will possibly be a very different story.
I don't want to give up on him either, but he has to step up this year. I don't like hearing that he is still inconsistent in practice. We need this guy to step it up.
I haven't completely given up, I'm just highly skeptical a guy that has done very little in his first two years is all the sudden going to turn it on and be the player he was sold as when he was drafted. You will be hard pressed to find examples of guys that have done that.it seems to me that you and some other posters gave up on him long time ago.
Yeah I don't fall in that category. I'm hoping I'm dead wrong on he and Pead. Nothing would make me happier.One can *question* if the guys we have are going to be *the* guys long term. There's nothing wrong with a fan doing that.
IMO, the line is only crossed when someone starts *hoping* a Ram will fail so they can come say how "right" they were. Because hoping *a* Ram fails is hoping *the* Rams fail.
the truth is Quick has been a disappointment so far, and inconsistency has been a major problem for him, and until he takes that next step forward and becomes more consistent it is not out of line to say he is and needs to correct that.Yeah I don't fall in that category. I'm hoping I'm dead wrong on he and Pead. Nothing would make me happier.
I didn't focus on the drop. I focused on Wagoner's description of Quick being inconsistent. His words not mine. I'm not at OTAs so I don't know if that's accurate or not. I just really want Quick to step up. We need him to. He was billed as a potential top end starting WR, right now he is in a fight to even get on the field.
I don't think that's even remotely true.wagoner is still butthurt that the rams didn't take watkins. i'll wait till we get reports from people who don't have an axe to grind with the current crop of wrs.
.
I don't see Wagoner as that type of guy. I hope Quick does great, but his time is now.wagoner is still butthurt that the rams didn't take watkins. i'll wait till we get reports from people who don't have an axe to grind with the current crop of wrs.
.