- Joined
- Feb 10, 2014
- Messages
- 5,278
- Name
- Dave
Here's my logic:
1. With there no longer being a 3rd QB exemption rule in the roster rules, teams are tending to go in with two QBs on the main roster and one on the practice squad.
2. To me, it seems pretty obvious that one of those QBs is going to be Bradford. The Cutler thing IS conceivably possible, but seems unlikely. There's a reason Chicago wants to be rid of the guy, and he just doesn't have "face of the franchise" qualities.
3. Definitely with Bradford and perhaps even with Cutler, it'd be a very good idea to bring in either a highly drafted QB or promising traded QB (not really seeing anything amongst the FAs worth even considering).
4. Neither Hill or Davis is PS eligible (if for no other reason on the latter, Davis was on the active roster all 16 games this year).
So neither comes back because there just isn't room.
1. With there no longer being a 3rd QB exemption rule in the roster rules, teams are tending to go in with two QBs on the main roster and one on the practice squad.
2. To me, it seems pretty obvious that one of those QBs is going to be Bradford. The Cutler thing IS conceivably possible, but seems unlikely. There's a reason Chicago wants to be rid of the guy, and he just doesn't have "face of the franchise" qualities.
3. Definitely with Bradford and perhaps even with Cutler, it'd be a very good idea to bring in either a highly drafted QB or promising traded QB (not really seeing anything amongst the FAs worth even considering).
4. Neither Hill or Davis is PS eligible (if for no other reason on the latter, Davis was on the active roster all 16 games this year).
So neither comes back because there just isn't room.