fearsomefour
Legend
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2013
- Messages
- 17,742
San DiegoYep. They should be the London Chargers baby.
or
Tijuana
San DiegoYep. They should be the London Chargers baby.
The great irony is now talks are progressing for a new A's stadium.Because Oakland didn’t cough up $, and Vegas did.
Davis wanted to stay in Oak, but $ won out.
This is giving Spanos way too much credit. Move to LA, have it be a spectacular failure, then get more monetary help from the league to slink back to SD?
Yeah, maybe this scenario could happen, but it sure wouldn’t be because of a “plan.”
Spanos is so darn stupid, he screwed over his city, his fans, and himself.
To me, this gets to a central question which I still don’t know the answer to.
My question is, “Does Kroenke WANT a second team as a tenant in his new stadium?”
On the one hand, it would seem that he does, since he gets a cut of game day revenue (at least partially, I think, from parking, etc.), as well as increased advertising, etc. Over the next 20 years or so, wouldn’t Kroenke make more money having a viable 2nd team as his tenant in Inglewood?
On the other hand, my understanding was that initially, Kroenke very much wanted LA all to himself. Kroenke only made the Inglewood stadium capable of hosting two teams because the owners forced him to do so. As I understand it, the owners basically said to Kroenke, “If you want to leave St Louis and build your new stadium in LA, you must also be willing to allow the Chargers to join you in LA if they choose.”
I guess I still don’t feel sure about what Kroenke wants NOW. My guess is that he still would prefer what he wanted initially— one city, one team— the LA Rams, and no one else.
@LesBaker I get they voted but it could be they voted against Davis as much as for Spanos. Not a lot of love for Mark and especially his dad.
Spanos is the NFL's reverse King Midas.
Every "stadium deal" he's touched has turned into poop.