rams1991
UDFA
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2015
- Messages
- 66
REPORT: Rams Are Interested In Acquiring Nick Foles http://wp.me/p4pK1g-1EV
He seems like a better guy than Bradford, no?
He seems like a better guy than Bradford, no?
I would trade a second rounder for him. He isn't worth a first. I would love it if we swapped 10 with 20 and Foles. Then Kelley could sell the farm for his guy.I have to think the cost would be pretty high. Philly would likely use the compensation to go get Mariotta.
I hope the #10 pick is out of the question - unless we are getting Foles and the Eagles #1 pick (#20 overall) - and I can't see the Eagles going that route.
He should have. Bradford never has had WRs like Jackson, Maclin. He hasn't had a RB like McCoy. He hasn't had offensive coaches like Reid and Kelly.He did more then Bradford
REPORT: Rams Are Interested In Acquiring Nick Foles http://wp.me/p4pK1g-1EV
He seems like a better guy than Bradford, no?
He should have. Bradford never has had WRs like Jackson, Maclin. He hasn't had a RB like McCoy. He hasn't had offensive coaches like Reid and Kelly.
Bradford has more talent. Foles has had a better singular year. I would take both and let them battle it out.
I would trade a second for him. It may be an overpay, but I think it's worth it.No. But he's a nice player to have compete with Bradford. It depends on the price. I wouldn't give up a 2nd for him.
He's overrated based on his stats from 2013 imo. I said that coming into this year. His play was nowhere near the level of his stats.
And, frankly, there are some misconceptions about him. A big one being that he has a big arm. His arm strength is nothing special. He's a lot like Glennon in terms of what he offers physically.
I wouldn't mind the guy but the price is a huge deal for me.
I would trade a second for him. It may be an overpay, but I think it's worth it.
Totally agree.I'm sure it'll raise plenty of eyebrows but if we're talking a 2nd for Foles vs. a 5th(or even 4th round value) for Glennon...give me Glennon.
Just to throw it out there, Bradford's 'broken shoulder' was much more serious prior to becoming our #1 overall pick, right? And I don't think anyone is advocating a first round pick for Foles.THIS IS LIKE AN EFFING NIGHTMARE!!!! NICK EFFING FOLES!?!? ARE WE SERIOUS?!? WHO COULD WANT THIS GUY!? HE JUST BROKE HIS SHOULDER....HE LOOKS LIKE HE'LL BRAKE OTHER BONES SOON TOO....WE NEED LINEMEN FELLAS....
Tampa needs a QB so why wouldn't they take Foles and a plethora of Eagles picks. Use Foles as a stop gap if nothing else. Foles is alot better than.anything Tampa has now.
Why do the Eagles need to do multiple moves to get to 1? Package everything your willing to give up in all the moves that are reported that need to be done and Foles and go for your guy if that's what Philly wants. Tampa gets Foles and a boatload of picks. If used properly Tampa is a powerhouse within 3 years under Lovey.
excusesHe should have. Bradford never has had WRs like Jackson, Maclin. He hasn't had a RB like McCoy. He hasn't had offensive coaches like Reid and Kelly.
Bradford has more talent. Foles has had a better singular year. I would take both and let them battle it out.
excuses
If u trade for Foles I don't think Bradford would restructure. I would move on from Bradford
Those who refuse to learn from the past, are doomed to repeat it......or something like that....Just to throw it out there, Bradford's 'broken shoulder' was much more serious prior to becoming our #1 overall pick, right?
Excuses?excuses
If u trade for Foles I don't think Bradford would restructure. I would move on from Bradford