It's not a narrative, it's who Stafford is.God this narrative was so annoyingly bad. Yes he's going to throw some picks due to his aggressive nature and I can live with that. But 41TDs/17ints is a good ratio.. especially when other QBs like Allen, Herbert, and Carr all threw two less INTs with 15, yet nowhere close to 41TDs. Stafford hardly gets fooled, and a handful of the INTs I think we can credit to his 1st year in the system and lack of chemistry with WRs down the field. I mean people forget it was his first year with Kupp and McVay because we won the SB. But look at how amazing he was in the playoffs taking care of the ball. 11TDs/3ints in the playoffs and a Lombardi!? With three consecutive come from behind 4th qtr wins. But..but..but.. Tart dropped a pick. Stafford is so fucking good man let the haters hate. ARob is gonna go nuts 90/1200/10 this year with Stafford just watch.
"ummmmmm his arm is falling off ummmmmm"NFL Media Experts (Spring 2021):
"Matthew Stafford ... Stat-compiler ... Can't Win the Big Games!"
Same guys since February 2022:
" Ummm -----------------------------------------------------" Ummm ----------------------------------"
The Elbow Issue must be real. Just a week ago, on ESPN's Get Up, the Experts spoke:"ummmmmm his arm is falling off ummmmmm"
The narrative was Stafford couldn't have been very good because he lead the league in picks. Which is 100% wrong.It's not a narrative, it's who Stafford is.
He's tied for fourth on the all-time pick-six list.. and is the active leader by 8 over Matt Ryan.. and has 9 more than Tom Brady.
He throws ints.. it's part of his QB DNA... and I wish they were all because of being aggressive. The reality is that he throws some brain-cramp balls. It's who he is.
Now.. he can also make fucking brilliant throws.. and lead a team to a Super Bowl win with only one starting WR... So, I'll take him.
That's Right!! Meanwhile were up shits creek facing a stud in Allen who threwYeah but, Stafford led the league in INT’s last year with 17 !!
Never mind that he threw 41 TD’s
I’m really not confused at all.The narrative was Stafford couldn't have been very good because he lead the league in picks. Which is 100% wrong.
And you're confusing "who he is" with who he had to be in Detroit. If he didn't ball out every game in Detroit, they had no chance to win. That means, make every throw, fit into every tight window, throw 50/50 balls consistently, take chances to try and score, etc. He had to do those things. He had no running game, no defense, and bad coaching. Their entire fortune relied on him making every difficult and aggressive throw.
Last year it was a process, but McVay coached some of that out of him. I mean look at how excellent he played down the stretch and into the playoffs. 11/3 td-int ratio in the postseason. In this offense and for this team, Stafford didn't have to make every single throw, win every single game on his own. He has a brilliant coach, two solid RBs, and a great defense that can win games on their own. I don't subscribe to "thats just who he is." He's too smart for that. He is aggressive by nature yes, but because he's absolutely had to be for a decade +. This year I bet he takes better care of the ball.
Lazy analysis by you. If you don’t think he had to push the envelope more in Detroit you’re insane. If he didn’t take care of the ball so well in the playoffs I’d maybe agree with you, but his decision making improved and the INTs went down. Not to mention two of the three playoff INTs were Van and Skows fault clearly.I’m really not confused at all.
His int rate.. pick 6s… consistent through line in his career.
Has the occasional brain cramp.. had one in NFC championship game, fortunately, Tartt dropped it.
I have a very clear understanding AND appreciation for Matthew Stafford.
It’s not lazy. It’s honest.Lazy analysis by you. If you don’t think he had to push the envelope more in Detroit you’re insane. If he didn’t take care of the ball so well in the playoffs I’d maybe agree with you, but his decision making improved and the INTs went down. Not to mention two of the three playoff INTs were Van and Skows fault clearly.
You look back to the game in Bills game AD99 destroyed them & AllenI want the Rams defense to shut down Josh Allen and the Bills offense so badly.
It’s getting tiresome listening to Bills fans going on and on about the great Josh Allen. Some are even calling him a unicorn
It’s not lazy. It’s honest.
People want to quantify his ints as “taking chances”, or “being a gunslinger”… and from what I saw… that’s bullshit. He threw some really poorly thought out passes.
It’s okay to observe faults in a guy’s game.
He had bad luck with some ints and some good luck on some bad throws.
I want the Rams defense to shut down Josh Allen and the Bills offense so badly.
It’s getting tiresome listening to Bills fans going on and on about the great Josh Allen. Some are even calling him a unicorn