New Playoff Seeding Idea

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Ground Chuck

Ground Chuck

Pro Bowler
Joined
Mar 31, 2025
Messages
1,033
ROD Credits
42,292
Name
JR
El Chapo Jr said:
I believe in divisions as well but if you're under .500, you shouldn't make the playoffs. I'm sorry, at that point, your team is too ass to warrant it lol
Click to expand...
I started responding to Chappo in a previous thread, but with all due humility (I am a complete idiot, after all) I kind of trailed off into an idea I think would be good:



@El Chapo Jr I agree. I believe there should be a new system:

If a division cannot produce a team with a +.500 record (9-8 or better) the playoff slot goes to the next best conference record.

For example: 2025

Seeding as played out:

1. Seachickens 14-3 *Bye
2. Bears 11-6
3. Iggles 11-6
4. Panthers 8-9

Wild Cards:
5. Rams 12-5
6. Whiners 12-5
7. Fudge Packers 9-7-1

New System:

1. Seachickens 14-3 *Bye
2. Bears 11-6
3. Iggles 11-6
4. Rams 12-5 *Rewarded with hosting playoff game due to being top wildcard seeding when the #4 seed division winner does NOT have a winning record.

Wild Cards:
5. Whiners 12-5
6. Fudge Packers 9-7-1
7. Viqueens 9-8 Slide in to #7 final spot due to being next best record, ousting the pathetic "division winning" Panthers.

*Now this system would ONLY apply if the division winner does NOT have a winning record, not if the next best team has a better record, thus not too drastically disrupting traditional playoff seedings.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What are your thoughts, ladies and gentlemen?



And so the message to the Panthers would have been:
You lose willy wonka GIF
 
  • 5Like
  • Cheers
  • High Five
Reactions: KombuchaTea, Turducken, Karate61 and 5 others
Ground Chuck said:
I started responding to Chappo in a previous thread, but with all due humility (I am a complete idiot, after all) I kind of trailed off into an idea I think would be good:



@El Chapo Jr I agree. I believe there should be a new system:

If a division cannot produce a team with a +.500 record (9-8 or better) the playoff slot goes to the next best conference record.

For example: 2025

Seeding as played out:

1. Seachickens 14-3 *Bye
2. Bears 11-6
3. Iggles 11-6
4. Panthers 8-9

Wild Cards:
5. Rams 12-5
6. Whiners 12-5
7. Fudge Packers 9-7-1

New System:

1. Seachickens 14-3 *Bye
2. Bears 11-6
3. Iggles 11-6
4. Rams 12-5 *Rewarded with hosting playoff game due to being top wildcard seeding when the #4 seed division winner does NOT have a winning record.

Wild Cards:
5. Whiners 12-5
6. Fudge Packers 9-7-1
7. Viqueens 9-8 Slide in to #7 final spot due to being next best record, ousting the pathetic "division winning" Panthers.

*Now this system would ONLY apply if the division winner does NOT have a winning record, not if the next best team has a better record, thus not too drastically disrupting traditional playoff seedings.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What are your thoughts, ladies and gentlemen?



And so the message to the Panthers would have been:
You lose willy wonka GIF
Click to expand...
This is exactly what I would want. Its embarrassing and a slap in the face to all other teams if someone with losing record makes it to the playoffs. This wouldn't make divisions not matter unless the completely all suck ass.
 
  • Like
  • High Five
Reactions: Karate61 and Ground Chuck
El Chapo Jr said:
This is exactly what I would want. Its embarrassing and a slap in the face to all other teams if someone with losing record makes it to the playoffs. This wouldn't make divisions not matter unless the completely all suck ass.
Click to expand...
You mean, like, nearly every year in both South divisions? (With apologies to this years Jags)
 
  • Like
  • High Five
Reactions: Karate61 and El Chapo Jr
Seems like the NBA system with the top 10 teams in the W / L column getting in would help stop a potential 7-10 team getting in to the playoff because they won a weak division. That can potentially eliminate team(s) with much better records who should be in, but didn't win their division.
The league still says something like "there would be no incentive to win your division then" which is old, left over thinking from 25 years ago that makes little sense today. How can the league still justify sending a team or more home for the season and let a team with 2 or more losses into the playoffs?
Divisions were / are just a way to group teams from basically a geographic standpoint and should not be a factor with the playoff seeding.
 
  • Like
  • High Five
Reactions: Karate61 and El Chapo Jr
El Chapo Jr said:
This is exactly what I would want. Its embarrassing and a slap in the face to all other teams if someone with losing record makes it to the playoffs. This wouldn't make divisions not matter unless the completely all suck ass.
Click to expand...
And it takes away possible incentive for the lousy teams in the NFC South to get better.
 
  • Like
  • High Five
Reactions: muggmeister, Karate61 and El Chapo Jr
I think the Divisions need a shake up instead of Confrence win-loss records. NFC South and East both risk losing record teams this year. Basically if its based off of win loss record it would be the NFC WEST VS NFC NORTH almost every year.

Divison Leaders right now
West 7-1
North 7-2
East 5-3-1
South 3-5

Wild card
Lions 6-2
Viks 6-2
Packers 6-3

On Bubble: Rams 5-4, Seahawks5-4, Cowboys 4-5-
 
  • Like
Reactions: Karate61
RamsOfCastamere said:
Winning your division has to mean something, otherwise what is the point? What goes around comes around, eventually. We would have gladly accepted that playoff spot if Bradford and Danario got it done.
Click to expand...
It absolutely does mean something.....exception being if the team is so pathetic as to not have a winning record.

Then they should get nothing. Nada. Zilch.
 
  • High Five
  • Like
Reactions: Karate61 and kmramsfan
Another idea not related to the playoffs is about natural rivalries. Playing in the same stadium would create that situation. Since there are 17 games the Rams and Chargers should play once a year, and twice a year when the two conference divisions go head to head.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Karate61
Good idea that could get implemented in the future.

Changes have been proposed. Waiting until the 18-game schedule starts. Here is these research results:

Yes, the NFL has actively discussed changing playoff seeding so that division winners with inferior records do not automatically host Wild Card teams with better records. While the rule remains unchanged for the 2026 season, team proposals and league-wide debates have brought the issue close to a formal vote. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Official NFL Proposals and Status
  • The 2025 Detroit Lions Proposal. Following the 2024 season—when the 14-win Minnesota Vikings had to play a road Wild Card game as the No. 5 seed—the Detroit Lions submitted a formal bylaw proposal to seed all seven conference playoff teams strictly by regular-season record. Division champions would still earn automatic playoff berths, but Wild Card teams with superior records would claim the higher seeds and host opening-round games. [1, 2, 3]
  • Compromise Variations. Before the league meetings in May 2025, discussions also included a middle-ground option. Under this variation, division winners would keep their automatic home games unless they finished the regular season at .500 or below. Another modified version proposed keeping Wild Card Weekend as-is, then reseeding teams strictly by record starting in the Divisional Round. [1, 2, 3]
  • Withdrawal and Current Status. A bylaw change requires approval from at least 24 of the 32 NFL owners. Recognizing a lack of sufficient owner support, the Lions withdrew their proposal in May 2025 before a formal vote took place. [1, 2, 3]
  • Future Outlook. According to Yahoo Sports, the NFL is keeping the current structure for the 2026 season and expects major seeding reforms to remain tabled until the league expands the regular season to 18 games. [1]

Why the Debate Persists in 2026
  • Recent Precedent. Since the NFL expanded to a 14-team playoff format in 2020, three division champions with losing records have hosted Wild Card games: the 2020 Washington Football Team (7-9), the 2022 Tampa Bay Buccaneers (8-9), and the 2025 Carolina Panthers (8-9). [1, 2]
  • The 2026 NFC South Race. Midway through the 2026 season, the NFC South is again led by teams with losing records—the Carolina Panthers and New Orleans Saints sit tied atop the division at 3-5. Meanwhile, three Wild Card contenders in the NFC North (Detroit, Minnesota, and Green Bay) all hold six wins, fueling renewed media and fan calls for seeding reform. [1, 2]

Key Arguments in the League
  • Case for Changing the Rule. Proponents argue that a 17-game regular season should reward overall excellence. Forcing a 12-to-14-win Wild Card team to travel to a sub-.500 division winner undermines competitive equity and devalues late-season games for teams locked out of their own division title.
  • Case for Keeping the Current System. Traditionalists, including several coaches and owners, argue that guaranteeing a home playoff game preserves the high stakes of division rivalries down to Week 18. Owners also favor the financial incentive of giving every franchise a 1-in-4 chance each year to host a lucrative home playoff game.


    [1, 2, 3]
 
  • Like
Reactions: Karate61
RamsOfCastamere said:
it doesn't happen often enough to change the rules.
Click to expand...
You make it sound like there needs to be a reprinting of 10,000 leather-bound rulebooks or something.

Every year there are new rules in the NFL. Some are ridiculous. Some make a lot of sense.

ONCE is often enough to make a change like this. And it happens more than once in a while. Happened last year. About to happen again this year.

So yeah, it does happen often enough to change the rules.
 
  • Like
Reactions: XXXIVwin and Karate61
Ground Chuck said:
I started responding to Chappo in a previous thread, but with all due humility (I am a complete idiot, after all) I kind of trailed off into an idea I think would be good:



@El Chapo Jr I agree. I believe there should be a new system:

If a division cannot produce a team with a +.500 record (9-8 or better) the playoff slot goes to the next best conference record.

For example: 2025

Seeding as played out:

1. Seachickens 14-3 *Bye
2. Bears 11-6
3. Iggles 11-6
4. Panthers 8-9

Wild Cards:
5. Rams 12-5
6. Whiners 12-5
7. Fudge Packers 9-7-1

New System:

1. Seachickens 14-3 *Bye
2. Bears 11-6
3. Iggles 11-6
4. Rams 12-5 *Rewarded with hosting playoff game due to being top wildcard seeding when the #4 seed division winner does NOT have a winning record.

Wild Cards:
5. Whiners 12-5
6. Fudge Packers 9-7-1
7. Viqueens 9-8 Slide in to #7 final spot due to being next best record, ousting the pathetic "division winning" Panthers.

*Now this system would ONLY apply if the division winner does NOT have a winning record, not if the next best team has a better record, thus not too drastically disrupting traditional playoff seedings.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What are your thoughts, ladies and gentlemen?



And so the message to the Panthers would have been:
You lose willy wonka GIF
Click to expand...


Half Baked Boo GIF


.
 
  • Like
  • HaHa
Reactions: Ground Chuck and Karate61
I like it they way it is except for 2 things. Only 1 team gets a bye. I think that is bullshit because of the strength of schedule can have to much to do with it.
Second. If a team wins the division with a loosing record they don't get a home field advantage. They get seeded like a WC team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ground Chuck and Karate61
I'm one of those keep the system as is.

You wanna a playoff game at home, then win your division.

You don't win your division, then tough tiddlywinks, you have to travel for away games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kurtfaulk
majrleaged said:
I like it they way it is except for 2 things. Only 1 team gets a bye. I think that is bullshit because of the strength of schedule can have to much to do with it.
Second. If a team wins the division with a loosing record they don't get a home field advantage. They get seeded like a WC team.
Click to expand...
Was never comfortable with and always hated the "1-team" Bye. Should be either 2 teams (1990-2019) or NO teams (future Playoff 1-8
2-7
3-6
4-5
Coming soon)
 
  • Like
  • High Five
Reactions: BC Ramfan and majrleaged
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back