fancents86
Starter
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2013
- Messages
- 997
Let's just say for arguments sake that the league votes for the Rams to stay, but Stan moves anyway, does the city of STL have any legal right to sue Stan?
Is that even possible? If the owners say no, then it's a no...that's how I understand it.Let's just say for arguments sake that the league votes for the Rams to stay, but Stan moves anyway, does the city of STL have any legal right to sue Stan?
I'd say so lol
This is embarrassing for the NFL.
So... This is the process?
Okay.
Pretty sure a team has moved before even after the nfl said no.Is that even possible? If the owners say no, then it's a no...that's how I understand it.
Too bad he doesn't care about the on field product at all. All about making that money.
Pretty sure a team has moved before even after the nfl said no.
Process to what?Or it's part of the process.
I get the emotional angle. I do. But this whole process is just that. Look at Oakland for no further proof.
Totally expected and big news all at the same time...
I noticed that too and i'm sure it's because there was a huge trollfest going on. Dunno why beacause this news was totally expected.With every post, I expect a bomb..Good job guys keeping it civil...and yes, RamStalk is shut and it's no coincidence to me..lol.