Nobody is saying Khan is an angel, I don't recall anyone ever saying that anywhere. The only thing I'm saying, and that anyone from what I've read has ever said, is that Khan's ties to the area are stronger than Stan's. His business isn't real estate. He is/was a season ticket owner. He is involved with UI. And he has shown a willingness to invest in the team he ended up buying by improving the stadium and the customer experience. That doesn't make him an angel or a hero, it makes him far less likely to move his hometown football team had he purchased them. There's been a lot of confusion on that point lately, that if someone did want or now wishes that Khan would have gotten the team that means they view Khan as a better person. That's not the case at all.
Wait... stronger than Stan's? Let's see... Stan was born in MO, still has his main residence in MO, his company is headquartered in MO, he graduated from Mizzou as did his son, he was integral in bringing the Rams TO St Louis, was part of an ownership group that campaigned to bring an expansion team to St Louis... and Khan's ties to the area are stronger?
Khan spent over $20 million under the cap last year. He put in $20 million toward renovations of what was already considered a top flight stadium. He did so instead of opening his books. He also is known for extremely cut throat business dealings.
Given the Dome situation, I see next to nothing that says he would be handling this any different. He is right behind Stan in richest owners. He has the wherewithal to do whatever he feels will benefit him the most and I don't see anything in his history that would suggest he wouldn't do just that.
The big difference is Khan has a lot of local ties to this area. Nobody can say for certain but my opinion is he would have truly worked to keep this franchise in St. Louis and not just that bullcrap with the EJD lease like SK.
I highly doubt Khan would have just waived the top 25% clause. Like it or not - the CVC put that clause in the lease in order to lure a team in. The idea that ANY owner would not hold the CVC to that clause just doesn't fit.
I don't see how anyone can blame Stan for putting his proposal together and winning in arbitration. If the CVC would have put together even a mildly realistic proposal, they might have won and it no doubt would have been a slam dunk to be able to extend the bonds to do so in that case as it was part of the original agreement. If the Dome couldn't be brought to top tier status short of Stan's proposal, what makes you think another owner would have been more accommodating? Without the threat of Inglewood, does anyone really think the Gov gets involved to this extent? Or does the St Louis stadium issue become just another of many where the owner threatens to move to LA?
My point is if the NFL is going to be welcomed back to LA it won't be tied to the Rams franchise coming back. LA will welcome the NFL back, period. I mean, that's what people are saying about St. Louis, right? Just plop the Raiders there and it will be all good because it's the NFL. Right?
Btw, this question isn't directed at you, den. I'm just tired of the general thinking that's it's ok to yank a franchise from a fanbase after 20 years and replace it with an even worse one. The fans in St. Louis has supported a losing ass team for 10 years and right when it is on the cusp of breaking through that team may move out and another losing ass franchise with no bright future ahead of them could move in. That crap isn't fair and it pisses a lot of fans and local media off.
This is what would probably piss me off more than what Stan is trying to do. I can understand his want to build the Taj Mahal. What really gets my goat is what is being floated as possibly the NFL's attitude that St Louis should take whatever crumbs the NFL gives them and be happy they got any crumbs at all. BTW - in this, I consider the Raiduhs crumbs.
If the Chargers and Raiders move to LA, they're going to play in the Inglewood stadium Stan is building. No matter what that stadium is going to get built.
And I can almost guarantee you that the Chargers AND Raiders are not playing in any new stadium that Stan builds. I also doubt the stadium gets built without Stan owning the team that plays in it. So there is really no way you can definitively say that the stadium is going to get built. I'm fine with that being your opinion but I would leave out the absolutes until they actually start digging that big ass hole.
Staying put is the more righteous, human thing to do for sure.
Absolutely.
I can't find a link for that famous quote, although I wouldn't be surprised he said it. He seems rather bullish on LA.
Yeah - I don't even want to look for the link but I do remember him saying it and I have seen it quoted before. Anything Jeruh says should be taken with at minimum a fair bit of skepticism.