I think that's what "worries" me most with Foles.
If we find out we need a QB next year, we're likely in a situation like Philly... Not enough ammo to move up.
Big decision for Snead and Fisher right now.
I have been saying all along that they are not convinced that Foles is the man. And they don't want to be caught shorthanded if he is not. Just say that Nick Foles plays better than he did last season, but not lights out like he did in 2013. So do the Rams have a good handle on who he is? Will they want to pay him what some team that keeps looking at his 2013 stats and convincing themselves that they can get that out of him will want to pay him? I am sure they are thinking that there is a definite risk there and are prepared, NOT to pay him what other teams will.
It is the same exact situation that they were in with Bradford. They would have to compete for his services at seasons end, and if he was not lights out I couldn't see them giving him a Joe Flacco contract with his injury history. At least this year they have a guy that should be healthy and ready to go. If he impresses enough they can decide to take the plunge and pay him big. If not they have a backup plan. Case Keenum is the backup, backup plan right now. If they don't get a good enough QB to start in 2016, they could possibly fall back on Keenum who should have the offense down by then, if he beats out Davis (which I think he does). That would buy them more time.
I really think the chances of them signing Foles are very slim, unless for some reason he decides to give them a discount......but why would he want to do that. Don't buy a Foles jersey just yet.