- Joined
- Nov 3, 2013
- Messages
- 42,084
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecb15/ecb15ae6afdff0466a647e2bbcfa59d84d9d211e" alt="Mood: Youngblood"
Show me ONE game like that....and no....Air Force doesn't count
HAHAHAHAHA
Again with deciding what does and doesn't count
Show me ONE game like that....and no....Air Force doesn't count
Also you keep saying a bad Stanford team yet they were only 2 games under .500 over 4 years. Incidentally they did win a few games vs ranked opponents but how many did he lose? Also a mediocre Stanford team is hands down much better than the Cal teams surrounding Goff.Yeah....and he stared down a bunch of them...with his cannon arm....about 30 years ago....QB's are different now...QB coaches.....7 on 7 camps...
oh, you haven't been paying attention to what I've been saying about QB's, corners, and wr's....now have you?
Oh go ahead OleSchool and use air force....so....what he do? throw for 500 yards, 6 tds?Again with deciding what does and doesn't count
Don't pay attention to the stats just the selective categories he wants to focus on!You mean the Elway that had twice as many INTs as TDs his rookie season? The one who averaged about a buck fifty per game and less than a 48% completion percentage? That John Elway? I suppose you are going to tell us he never stared down his receivers or looked less than HOF material in his first two years.
They were bad...below .500 is bad no?Also you keep saying a bad Stanford team yet they were only 2 games under .500 over 4 years. Incidentally they did win a few games vs ranked opponents but how many did he lose? Also a mediocre Stanford team is hands down much better than the Cal teams surrounding Goff.
That's Elway....plenty of picks...DOWNFIELD....some big wow throws too....big WINS too...low completion %%...but....there you go comparing the game of 30 years ago to todays....Don't pay attention to the stats just the selective categories he wants to focus on!
Wow. You really do know how to move goal posts. I guess staring down the receiver only counts if you are Jared Goff.Yeah....and he stared down a bunch of them...with his cannon arm....about 30 years ago....QB's are different now...QB coaches.....7 on 7 camps...
oh, you haven't been paying attention to what I've been saying about QB's, corners, and wr's....now have you?
They played 3 in his 3 years Oregon twice and Utah once and lost to all of them. That doesn't make Goff bad especially when a team coming off a 1 win season plays a top 5 team the next year and only loses on the road by 1 score. Your fixation with a QB is the only factor in a team winning in college or pro football is just baffling for somebody who's as smart as you are brother.They were bad...below .500 is bad no?
Lost plenty...he played in the pac-10...
So....they were better....I gotcha....
Was gonna ask did Cal beat ANY ranked teams....? but of course that's not fair. Not even playing field...Moving the goal posts...you know...cheater....that's what you're implying, no? With the label?
QB play often decides who plays in the post-season....You can win with a sub-par QB....for a few games...like a playoff run...but a season you need play like we saw LAST night...Your fixation with a QB is the only factor in a team winning in college or pro football is just baffling
No...It only counts when you've been told about the problem, and are unable to correct it. Like last night...seemed to make a concentrated effort to look off defenders. I wonder why?I guess staring down the receiver only counts if you are Jared Goff.
Because he's a good young QB who's growing with good coaching. Assuming a 22 year old QB with less than a season worth of starts is a finished product is foolish.No...It only counts when you've been told about the problem, and are unable to correct it. Like last night...seemed to make a concentrated effort to look off defenders. I wonder why?