MMQB: Rams Preview - Defense Might Not Be Enough

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
robert-quinn.jpg

Jeff Roberson/AP

Rams Preview: Defense Might Not Be Enough
Injuries forced St. Louis to change approaches on offense last season, and recent personnel moves indicate a unit still searching for an identity. Can a monstrous defensive line hold down the fort in the NFL's toughest division?
By Andy Benoit

OFFENSE
What, exactly, are the Rams trying to be? Right now, they’re a team with an identity crisis. Last year, head coach Jeff Fisher and GM Les Snead used the eighth overall pick on Tavon Austin and signed free agent flex tight end Jared Cook for a $16 million signing bonus. Both moves were significant investments in a quick-striking spread offense—like the one quarterback Sam Bradford thrived in at Oklahoma.

But Bradford and his receivers struggled mightily in a spread scheme out of the gates last year. To alleviate the pressure, offensive coordinator Brian Schottenheimer incorporated more basic, run-oriented—even <em>smash mouth</em>—concepts in Weeks 5 and 6. The adjustment worked.

Then Bradford tore his ACL in Week 7 and, with backup Kellen Clemens at the helm and needing to be hidden, the adjustment became permanent. Aside from a few 3 x 2 sets in passing situations, the Rams abandoned an aerial attack that too often was restricted to underneath targets anyway (the quarterbacks’ fault, not the play-caller’s). They committed to a ball control approach, led by fifth-round rookie running back Zac Stacy.

One might have chalked this up to the Rams just making due with the resources they had. But this past offseason, with everyone healthy, Fisher and Snead used the second overall pick on Greg Robinson. If you’re a spread offense that gets the ball out quickly and in space, it doesn’t make sense to invest heavily in a mauling offensive lineman, especially if you already have a good (and pricey) veteran left tackle like Jake Long. This sort of investment would, however, make sense if you’re a grinding offense that wants to keep running “power” and “counter” inside, like the Rams did a year ago.

But in this case, where does last year’s first-rounder fit? The Robinson selection almost directly contradicts the Austin selection. There’s a role somewhere for Austin in a traditional black and blue offense, but it’s miniscule and hard to pinpoint. Austin is a guy who needs to be on the move and given the ball in space. This is hard to do out of traditional two-back, run-type sets. In those, you feature more play-action passes and isolation routes on the outside, requiring receivers to create their own separation off the line. That’s very difficult for the 5-8, 175-pound Austin.

tavon-austin.jpg

In 13 games last season, Tavon Austin had 191 touches—151 carries, 40 catches—and five touchdowns. (Jeff Roberson/AP)

Separating from man coverage was actually difficult for this entire receiving corps last season. That won’t suddenly change in 2014, so Schottenheimer is going to have to incorporate more intertwined man-beater concepts like the ones he ran with the low-octane Jets a few years ago. He at least has a deep cast, though it’s one that’s bereft of clear-cut starters. Austin Pettis is Bradford’s security blanket, but the lanky fourth-year pro is not quite a playmaker. The speedy, long-striding Chris Givens can make plays but is constricted by unrefined route running.

Brian Quick, a second-round pick in 2012, needs to be used more, but that can’t happen if he fails to haul in catchable balls or stays too upright in running downfield routes. Last year’s third-round pick, Stedman Bailey, has made slow progress in carving out a niche; a four-game suspension to begin the season won’t help. And newcomer Kenny Britt, because of knee problems, is a shell of his former self.

Schottenheimer also has Jared Cook at tight end. Cook is at his best in spread sets where he can detach from the formation and draw matchups against linebackers. In a power running system, he is asked to play more along the line of scrimmage, where his blocking is very inconsistent. Joining Cook is move-oriented tight end Lance Kendricks plus H-back Cory Harkey, who was a stalwart lead-blocker for Stacy last season.

The drafting of running back Tre Mason in Round 3 was similar to the Robinson pick in that it suggests a commitment to a power running offense. Though built like Giovani Bernard at 5-8, 205 pounds, Mason has the potential to be a foundational type back, capable of ramming the ball inside. The Rams won’t ask him to do that fulltime, though, at least not right away.

Most likely, Mason will complement Stacy, who could be difficult to take off the field. Stacy’s 3.9 yards per carry last season doesn’t look impressive on paper, but the low average was partly a function of how a power running offense operates. On film, Stacy was intriguing, showing lateral agility and quick feet in confined areas and having the downhill momentum to keep moving forward on contact.

Stacy and Mason will be working behind Robinson, a future tackle who is transitioning into the NFL at left guard. Robinson couldn’t ask for a better player to learn alongside than Jake Long, who stood out as a run-blocker and pass protector last season before tearing his ACL and MCL two days before Christmas. The seventh-year veteran is said to be fully recovered. To Robinson’s right is 11th-year center Scott Wells, creating a sandwich of veteran wisdom around the rookie.

On the right side, tackle Joe Barksdale lacks the athleticism to hold up in pass protection, but the Rams are content to gamble with him because they want Rodger Saffold to play guard. When he wasn’t hurt, Saffold flashed in the running game last year. The Rams did make provisions in case he has to slide back to right tackle, signing Davin Joseph, a former Pro Bowl guard in Tampa Bay whose career has been derailed by injuries.

Conducting this show is Bradford, whom the Rams insist is Their Guy. Though Bradford has two years remaining on a rookie deal that’s keeping his cap number in the mid teens (very reasonable for a starting QB), this is a make-or-break year for him. Injuries were a problem coming out of Oklahoma, and that’s remained the case in the pros (torn ACL last year, ankle injury two years before that).

What system the Rams ultimately run this year largely will be a function of what Bradford is most comfortable with. He has the arm strength and pinpoint accuracy to prosper in any scheme. His problem has been a lack of pocket poise coupled with tunnel vision. There have been too many instances where he gets impatient and doesn’t see the entire field. Those are crippling weaknesses for an NFL quarterback.

The Rams don’t need Bradford to be a superstar. In fact, they quietly went 4-3 without him down the stretch, with wins over the Colts, Saints and playoff-contending Bears. But they do need Bradford to become dependable. Otherwise they’ll have to ask too much of their potentially spectacular defense.

DEFENSE
What makes this unit potentially spectacular is a defensive line that, heading into the draft, may have already been the best in football. It certainly was coming out of it, as the Rams were pleasantly surprised to find defensive tackle Aaron Donald still on the board when picking again at 13. With that selection, this officially became the NFL’s only D-line to boast four former first-round picks.

rams-lbs.jpg

In order to reach their full potential on defense, the Rams need linebacker James Laurinaitis and Alec Ogletree to play better against the run. (Jeff Roberson/AP)

Donald will work alongside Michael Brockers (drafted 14th overall in 2012) and ahead of two outstanding backups, Kendall Langford and Eugene Sims (who can also play defensive end). Tremendously strong hands and a burst off contact make Brockers one of the most thunderous block-shedders in the game. It helps that he faces a lot of one-on-one scenarios playing alongside Robert Quinn (14th in 2011). Quinn is far and away the most terrifying edge-rusher in the game right now. Opposite him is Chris Long (second overall in 2008), whose speed and quickness have gradually climbed from average to solid to impressive over his career.

Last year’s defensive coordinator Tim Walton did an excellent job at creating one-on-one opportunities for his pass rushers through a variety of different fronts. Two prominent wrinkles were having Quinn align inside, where he was equally as explosive, and using two three-techniques on passing downs, which compromises a lot of an offensive line’s double-team concepts and is a great way to set up stunts.

Walton, unfortunately, did not excel in other areas and got replaced this past offseason by Gregg Williams, whom Fisher had originally hired upon arriving in St. Louis two years ago, just prior to Williams’s Bountygate suspension. Williams’s scheme will be similar to Walton’s in pass-rushing alignments and the zone-based coverage concepts that Fisher likes. What’ll be different are the wrinkles of aggression, something Williams typically applies on blitzes. But with such a lethal front, he will now apply more to coverage disguises and rotations.

The question is whether St. Louis’s young back seven can handle this. Middle linebacker James Laurinaitis has evolved into a savvy vet, but there’s little evidence that he can carry a unit Ray Lewis-style. It’s disconcerting that, even with a domineering front four, the Rams last season were gouged repeatedly on the ground, especially by zone rushing attacks. While the safety run support was never great, there has to be some blame on Laurinaitis’s linebacking unit.

Working alongside Laurinaitis is the back seven defender with the most to learn but also the one with the most upside: Alec Ogletree. The second-year pro has rare speed and fluidity but must figure out how to recognize even basic NFL offensive designs. Physically, Ogletree is clearly this defense’s most versatile chess piece; it will be fascinating to see how Williams uses him.

In the secondary are third-year corners Janoris Jenkins and Trumaine Johnson, both of whom had first-round talent entering the NFL but respectively fell to Rounds 2 and 3 because of character concerns. Jenkins has playmaking prowess as long as his confidence does not waiver. Johnson has shown the ability to transition from zone to man coverage on the outside, which is vital for excelling in a single-high safety base defense.

To rectify the team’s problems in nickel, Fisher and Snead drafted Lamarcus Joyner in the second round. The 5-8, 185-pounder can fill the slot and, based on his experience at Florida State, has the potential to drop back to safety in the base 4-3 (a la Tyrann Mathieu in Arizona). In that case he’d be supplanting free safety Rodney McLeod, who has also played the slot in certain sub-packages. At strong safety is T.J. McDonald, a straight-line athlete who covers ground quickly thanks to his length. To back up—or maybe eventually challenge—McDonald, the Rams used a fourth-round pick on hard-hitting converted linebacker Mo Alexander.

SPECIAL TEAMS
After going 7 of 13 on 50-plus-yard field goals in 2012, Greg Zuerlein was asked to kick from that deep just twice last year (he made one). Punter Johnny Hekker set an NFL record with a 44.2 net average. In the return game, Tavon Austin was up and down as a rookie but found his lethal rhythm as the season progressed.

BOTTOM LINE
If the Rams played in the NFC East, they’d be a dark horse contender because of their defense. But unfortunately they’re in the loaded NFC West, where San Francisco and Seattle have even better defenses plus and—here’s the real separation—the offenses to go along with it.
 

ZigZagRam

Pro Bowler
Joined
May 12, 2014
Messages
1,846
If the Rams played in the NFC East, they’d be a dark horse contender because of their defense.

Dark horse contender in the NFC East?

I'd be surprised if we didn't go 6-0 in our own division if we were in the NFC East.
 
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Messages
5,808
But unfortunately they’re in the loaded NFC West, where San Francisco and Seattle have even better defenses plus and—here’s the real separation—the offenses to go along with it.

Completely agree with that, assuming none of the three teams have changed at all during the off season.
 

BigRamFan

Super Bowl XXXVI was rigged!
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
2,896
Name
Craig
Couldn't even finish reading this regurgitated garbage. It is quite obvious the only game this "writer" saw last year was the first game against the whiners and has not seen a minute of this year's TC.
 

mr.stlouis

Legend
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
6,454
Name
Main Hook
This is the year Rams offense backs up their defense. They won't play at the same level as the defense, but they not gonna hurt it like in years past. We will sustain drives and score more TD's.
 

blue4

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
3,126
Name
blue4
This whole article seems written by a guy who is unsure of anything but the names on a stat sheet.
 

Athos

Legend
Joined
May 19, 2014
Messages
5,933
This whole article seems written by a guy who is unsure of anything but the names on a stat sheet.

Agreed. And what "identity crisis" is he referring to? The change last year to more of a power run scheme and this years draft pretty much figured out our identity on offense. Run it down the other team's throat, lightning strike them with play action, sprinkle in two 2 TE sets, and some trickeration from Tavon.

Pretty clear the direction Fisher wants on offense now. Limit Bradford's passing and go for more high completion, big play vertical threats.

I'm betting, if the Quick/Britt combo carries over from practice, we'll see a ton of intermediate completions this season.
 

Rmfnlt

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
5,342
Fans on this board seem a little divided in what they think the Rams offense might look like... and the draft picks this year do support the idea that they'll run heavy vs. last year when it looked like pass (spread).

So, the concept of not knowing what they are yet seems reasonable to me.

Granted, Britt has a lot of question marks, but I wouldn't classify him as a shell of his former self. That one's weird.

The defensive front seven will be fine IMO - Lauriniaitis and Ogletree will be fine.

The secondary still has a lot of inexperience, so not sure what we'll get out of that group.

But the offense has to find a way to score more... be it running the ball or passing... I don't really care.
 

Irish

Starter
Joined
Jun 20, 2014
Messages
962
Man, some people get so butthurt when the Rams are criticized.

The 2013 Rams Defense finished 15th in total defense, 19th against the pass, 9th against the run, and had a -6 turn over ratio. They added a d lineman who, while he could be dominant, will be a rotational player, a nickle corner, and some corner depth.

The Rams will get more sacks this year (probably), and Ogletree will improve, but are we seriously expecting the addition of a rookie d lineman who will not play every down and a rotational corner and Gregg Williams defense to account for 6-8 sports up in total defense, 5-7 spots up against the pass, and maybe make us top 5 against the run? If we can't answer those questions with a confident yes, then we are relying on an offense that put up bloated, gaudy numbers in blow out games when trying to come from behind in the first half of the season and a run first offense to make up an additional 10-14 points a game at least to compensate.

The question marks on Offense are holding back the preseason previews, and skepticism that the Rams will be better against the pass and big plays is holding them back as well. Until the Rams go 8+ games and prove they have, in fact, changed their stripes, no one should buy into anything other than what they are: a .500 team that lacks a couple key playmakers on each side of the ball to get them over the hump.
 

Robocop

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
1,933
Name
J.
wooow this asshole has absolutely no knowledge of this team besides reading stat sheets and watching game highlights from last year. the NFC East??? we couldve won that division last year with Clemens! offensive identity crisis, not since Stacy emerged... jesus. there is nothing legit about the article cus the guy just stole punch lines from every other "analysts" since last season, stuck em in his article and then added a few extra asinine remarks that make him look even less knowledgeable. damn i woke up cranky. i cant read anymore of this crap im ready for this team to shut these assholes up, is it September yet??
 

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #14
This whole article seems written by a guy who is unsure of anything but the names on a stat sheet.

Personally I enjoy it when the media writes anything about our team but the posters on here do a much better job for the most part. Of course the national media covers all 32 teams while we focus in on only one. This article was good for the most part ,but like @blue4 mentioned in the quote above, there is a hint that the writer of the article wrote this without seeing the team up close in training camp. An example:

"And newcomer Kenny Britt, because of knee problems, is a shell of his former self."

Also any sentence that includes the name Tim Walton and the words "excellent job" is an indicator of someone who did not watch Rams games last season.

"Janoris Jenkins has playmaking prowess as long as his confidence does not waiver."

Jenkins to be sure has his flaws but confidence is not one of them.

"the Rams last season were gouged repeatedly on the ground"

Not true. Our run D actually improved.

"If the Rams played in the NFC East, they’d be a dark horse contender because of their defense."

If the Rams played in the NFC East they'd be duking it out with only the Eagles and there would be nothing "dark horse contender" about them.
 

Rmfnlt

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
5,342
im ready for this team to shut these assholes up, is it September yet??

And, when they do, articles like this will disappear.

Until then, you might consider not reading previews... most of them are not going to be glowing like you want... until the Rams prove themselves.

Personally, I think that's fair.
 
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Messages
5,808
The 2013 Rams Defense finished 15th in total defense, 19th against the pass, 9th against the run

Why do people use yardage when ranking Os or Ds? I've never understood that when you have a much better measure, is it just tradition or what?
 

Fatbot

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
1,467
But Bradford and his receivers struggled mightily in a spread scheme out of the gates last year. To alleviate the pressure, offensive coordinator Brian Schottenheimer incorporated more basic, run-oriented—even smash mouth—concepts in Weeks 5 and 6. The adjustment worked.

Then Bradford tore his ACL in Week 7 and, with backup Kellen Clemens at the helm and needing to be hidden, the adjustment became permanent. Aside from a few 3 x 2 sets in passing situations, the Rams abandoned an aerial attack that too often was restricted to underneath targets anyway (the quarterbacks’ fault, not the play-caller’s).
Sigh, ok... Stopped reading at this point since it's just so incorrect. Not sure if this writer is Schotty's cousin or what, but it's really revisionist history to avoid any blame on Schotty. I am a believer that players execution is ultimately what wins or loses games, not coordinators, but coordinators matter and this writer is not realistic in totally ignoring Schotty's role in last year's failures.

First, the Rams did not open the season in a spread offense. Everyone thought they might become a Denver-type of spread because of the Cook & Austin acquisitions, but what the Rams actually ran was a west coast offense for those first 4 games, trying to substitute a short ball control passing game for a running game. And it was horrible.

Next, it is wrong to imply Schotty alone had the divine brainstorm "to alleviate the pressure" and change to a more smash mouth running game. Most (if not all) reports attribute that decision to Fisher. And the writer is incorrect again saying the adjustment only "became permanent in week 7" when SB got hurt. The change was declared in week 4 in Fisher's "extended preseason" locker room speech, when he basically called a do-over on the season after those horrible first 4 games.

Finally, the most grating comment, that the dink passes were "the quarterbacks’ fault, not the play-caller’s". That's an irresponsible statement. I personally believe it was due to Schott's design and intent to replace a running game with short passes. Others were quick to point the finger at Bradford "checking down". That argument is still open, it's irresponsible for a writer to just declare it all the QB's fault. Again, he seems to be intent on shielding Schotty from any blame for some weird reason.

My two cents is they all need to be better: Fish, Schott, SB, the whole team, and hopefully it starts in the game plan. Step 1 is great, Fisher has set the tone of smash mouth running to control the ball. Now Schott needs to ditch the wuss coast patterns and push the ball vertical and keep defenses on their heels. SB needs to get back to before last year when his air yards were improving every year of his career. Early reports from camp (for what that's worth) sound good with Britt & Co. having success deep, I hope we see some of it tomorrow (again, for what it's worth as it's still preseason!).
 

blue4

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
3,126
Name
blue4
Man, some people get so butthurt when the Rams are criticized.

The 2013 Rams Defense finished 15th in total defense, 19th against the pass, 9th against the run, and had a -6 turn over ratio. They added a d lineman who, while he could be dominant, will be a rotational player, a nickle corner, and some corner depth.

The Rams will get more sacks this year (probably), and Ogletree will improve, but are we seriously expecting the addition of a rookie d lineman who will not play every down and a rotational corner and Gregg Williams defense to account for 6-8 sports up in total defense, 5-7 spots up against the pass, and maybe make us top 5 against the run? If we can't answer those questions with a confident yes, then we are relying on an offense that put up bloated, gaudy numbers in blow out games when trying to come from behind in the first half of the season and a run first offense to make up an additional 10-14 points a game at least to compensate.

The question marks on Offense are holding back the preseason previews, and skepticism that the Rams will be better against the pass and big plays is holding them back as well. Until the Rams go 8+ games and prove they have, in fact, changed their stripes, no one should buy into anything other than what they are: a .500 team that lacks a couple key playmakers on each side of the ball to get them over the hump.

Not exactly butthurt. More confused because the article seems to be recycled from the author's 2013 archives. He literally expects not one young player to improve? I think it's well within Fisher's expectations to move up 6-8 spots in both total and pass defense. I expect he's thinking we'll move up in scoring defense as well. We're counting on not only the rookie d-lineman and a corner, but on Jenkins, Johnson, Brockers, Ogletree, McDonald all gaining experience and improving on last season. And at their age, it's not a leap of faith that they can be loads better not only with another year under their belt, but with far superior coaching. To me, it would be a huge failure NOT to achieve those things you say are unreasonable.

It's not even the low expectations from the author that really get me, it's the many factual errors that read like he copied his 2013 notes. Prime Time's post above has several. This one really had me laughing

"On the right side, tackle Joe Barksdale lacks the athleticism to hold up in pass protection, but the Rams are content to gamble with him because they want Rodger Saffold to play guard."

Anyone watching the Rams last year, or a professional journalist, would know after speaking to a minimum of contacts with the team or watching a few games would know he held up well and graded out pretty good. Not anywhere near a gamble.
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
The Rams will get more sacks this year (probably), and Ogletree will improve, but are we seriously expecting the addition of a rookie d lineman who will not play every down and a rotational corner and Gregg Williams defense to account for 6-8 sports up in total defense, 5-7 spots up against the pass, and maybe make us top 5 against the run?
Why not? How many people thought, during the 99 offseason, that adding a rookie receiver, a UDFA QB, a FA RB, and new OC would make the Rams jump up 23 spots in total offense and win a SB?
 

Tron

Fights for the User
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
7,812
Name
Tron
Last year’s third-round pick, Stedman Bailey, has made slow progress in carving out a niche; a four-game suspension to begin the season won’t help. And newcomer Kenny Britt, because of knee problems, is a shell of his former self

This is where i decided to stop reading, might continue later...maybe. Really was looking forward to reading about the defense but w/e.