BeerOClock
Rookie
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2014
- Messages
- 139
This first part is wrong.
After drafting Sam, Fisher said, "In a world of diversity that we live in, I'm honored to be a part of this."
Demoff said, “It was a reminder of the power of the NFL, and how we could use the power for something good.”
Fisher brought in gay activist Wade Davis to address the team and organization on the issue of being gay in the NFL.
So of course it's about football. But it's about more than that, even to the Rams. They've said as much.
My first part is absolutely, 100% correct.
I said: "Michael Sam should be evaluated, selected and treated like any other NFL prospective player and not unfairly judged because he happens to be gay. This is fair and what has been asked of the team, fans and press."
Every action and every word that both Fisher and Demoff are saying is "they are honored to not unfairly judge Sam because he happens to be gay. It is a reminder of the power of the NFL to not unfairly judge Sam because happens to be gay." In other words, exactly as I said, "this is what has been asked of the the team, fans and press." Fisher and Demoff are saying that they are, with good feelings and intentions, meeting this responsibility. Nothing more.
You are saying that the Rams are trying to advance the gay agenda by drafting Sam--pure bullsh*t. Demoff and Fisher are trying to win football games, not forward a social agenda. Michael Sam was a value in Round #7, Fisher and Demoff consciously judged Sam fairly and choose him. Nothing more. It's YOU and YOUR AGENDA that's making Fisher and Demoff's statements into more than this. If Sam wasn't a value in Round #7, he wouldn't have been chosen.