how do we know next years class will be any better. I hope we are one of the poor suckers who drafts a qb in this class so he can be learning the system. no one thinks seattle or new England are poor suckers who overdrafted their qb. besides I for one would rather have petty,hunley or grayson with a years experience than keenan or davis for a backup. if foles does not work out or if he does and we can't afford to resign him we will have a backup with a year under his belt.
Through advance scouting. Something that teams do. Next year's class certainly looks better right now in terms of depth.
Doesn't matter if a mediocre QB knows the system, he's still a mediocre QB.
Great. You can bank on us being Seattle or New England. But I'm not making that bet. From 2000(Brady) to 2012(Wilson), there were 115 QBs drafted in the 3rd through 7th rounds. Guess how many of those QBs developed into quality starters? 9(7.8%).
Those 9 QBs are/were:
1. Tom Brady
2. Matt Schaub
3. Ryan Fitzpatrick
4. Marc Bulger
5. Kyle Orton
6. Matt Cassel
7. David Garrard
8. Russell Wilson
9. Nick Foles
And frankly, I'm stretching the word "quality". Cassel, Orton, and Fitzpatrick are career "bridge" QBs. The jury is still out on Foles. So in actuality, only 5 of those QBs actually are/were quality starters. And some might argue that Garrard wasn't(but I'm counting him anyways).
So our percentage chance at landing a quality QB banking on the Seahawks and Patriots as examples is at 4.3%. If Foles turns into a quality QB, our chances rise to 5.2% but our need for a QB is gone.
So basically, the odds of you finding the next Russell Wilson or Tom Brady are remote. And I'm certainly not betting on it in this weak QB class.