http://www.turfshowtimes.com/2010/4/22/1437727/2010-nfl-draft-browns-prepared-toYeah. I remember it clear as day.
I'll have to dig it up, but that was Holmgren's last plea to Devaney. And when Devaney said no, Holmgren said "you made the right call."
Dewey, gotta go with #1...The one aspect to Bradford that I didn't like was his ability (or lack thereof) of elevating the play of those around him. But certainly, no trade for Foles would have happened with #1.I had this thought earlier... what would you do if I gave you a magical button that could do exactly one of two things:
1 - Go back to 2010 and make it so Sam Bradford never gets injured (knee, ankle, nothin' - no injuries)
2 - Go back to 2010 and make it so the Rams draft someone else (Suh, McCoy, whatever)
Which would you do?
X, if I had been asked which way you would have swung on this question, I would have bet all that own that you would be going for the magically healthy Sam Bradford..Duuude..lol....ha!Very good question.
I'd probably not draft him if I KNEW that the Browns for sure were offering most of their draft (and something the following year) for the rights to draft Bradford. Coulda signed like Matt Moore or Gratkowski and drafted Earl Thomas or JPP. Or both.
Yeah, I thought about it for a little while. But I came to the conclusion that even a magically healthy Sam Bradford is still just one guy. Throwing to the same group of also-ran receivers while playing behind the same meh O-line wouldn't have done us much good. In hindsight, we really should have built the rest of the team up after the fire-sale of 2009. Would have been more productive in the long-run. But that also takes into consideration that Devaney/Spagnuolo actually knew how to build a team. I don't know that to be true either.X, if I had been asked which way you would have swung on this question, I would have bet all that own that you would be going for the magically healthy Sam Bradford..Duuude..lol....ha!
DAMMIT CHARLIE WHITEHURST.Suh doesn't have us knocking on the door of the playoffs in 2010. And a Suh pick would just extend this decade long rebuild process another year or two while we wait for another competent QB to fall in our laps.
This is what I think they should have done... and I felt it at the time of that draft. Just too many holes. And, obviously, Devaney and Spagnuolo didn't know how to build a championship team.Yeah, I thought about it for a little while. But I came to the conclusion that even a magically healthy Sam Bradford is still just one guy. Throwing to the same group of also-ran receivers while playing behind the same meh O-line wouldn't have done us much good. In hindsight, we really should have built the rest of the team up after the fire-sale of 2009. Would have been more productive in the long-run. But that also takes into consideration that Devaney/Spagnuolo actually knew how to build a team. I don't know that to be true either.
Well, if we are magically thinking BRadford and he couldn't be hurt..Maybe we got the next Brett Favre! Super Hero Sam.....Yeah, I thought about it for a little while. But I came to the conclusion that even a magically healthy Sam Bradford is still just one guy. Throwing to the same group of also-ran receivers while playing behind the same meh O-line wouldn't have done us much good. In hindsight, we really should have built the rest of the team up after the fire-sale of 2009. Would have been more productive in the long-run. But that also takes into consideration that Devaney/Spagnuolo actually knew how to build a team. I don't know that to be true either.