Fuckin HOF committee can go screw themselves.
Wow, say what you will about Mike, he’s always amazing to listen to.
If that's true, then blowing it against the Patriots in XXXVI is still costing them today.
Its about the player, not the team they were on.Bernie Miklasz, who was on the HOF committee, has been saying that for years. That some voters think for a team that won only one Super Bowl, they have enough representation in the Hall already.
If that's true, then blowing it against the Patriots in XXXVI is still costing them today.
Holt is a finalist every year, and from what I've heard when it comes to the final cut from 15 to 5, he's only just missing out. He'll break through eventually.
Except these players are all compared against each other. Who should get in vs who shouldn't. At that point how much help they had, the context of where they played or how much they contributed to team success becomes a debate.Its about the player, not the team they were on.
How many do they have? I mean the Colts have 5 from a team with only 1 SBBernie Miklasz, who was on the HOF committee, has been saying that for years. That some voters think for a team that won only one Super Bowl, they have enough representation in the Hall already.
Warner, Faulk, Pace, Bruce, Aeneas Williams (2001). For me, I think Holt, S-Jax, and yes, even Reggie Wayne from that Colts team should've been in a long, long time ago.How many do they have? I mean the Colts have 5 from a team with only 1 SB
Yeah....that is one way to do it and another is just pure stats.Except these players are all compared against each other. Who should get in vs who shouldn't. At that point how much help they had, the context of where they played or how much they contributed to team success becomes a debate.
Playing for a good team or bad team is definitely a factor. Look at what is always said about Stafford. He couldn’t elevate Detroit. Detroit was one of the worst run franchises in the NFL during Stafford’s tenure there.Its about the player, not the team they were on.
Otherwise, you would have zero players in who never won a ring.
People have an unending ability to complicate very simple things.
Damn straight. All you have to do is look at terrell owens vs Isaac Bruce..
I've always said the lack of TDs has hurt Holt's chances but Irvin has even less TDs than Holt.
But he was a look at me big mouth. The Nimrods who vote seem to like that character trait.
.