No reason signing Easley would impact Brockers at all. A DL rotation is what a great D needs. Impacting someone like Smart? Yes.Need him for depth , early and longacre can both make plays and need to keep 99 and brockers fresh.
Need a big body for the middle , pot roast was one of the reasons that Denver D was so stingy. Would not want to waste brockers talent just occupying the middle .
They will.So we move Brockers out of NT into the LDE spot and he excels and now we fans want to move him back to NT? Nah add a NT and leave the guy where he kicked butt.
Hardly the same thing.Can we bring back Dunbar, too? /s
Easley can’t be counted on tobe a starterstay healthy. He’s a depth signing to back up Donald/Brockers. Brockers needs to stay at the 5 tech position.
Hardly the same thing.
Finding a talented DL who can work in rotation is much harder than finding a rotational RB.
I know.My point was was Easley is seemingly always injured. I don't think dude has ever played a full season.
During one of the games late last season during a break, they cut to the Rams sideline where they had a short conversation with Dom Easley. He said his knee had been reconstructed and it felt stronger than before his first ACL and he was well ahead of rehab. He said he fully expect to be back with the Rams for OTA's and TC.
Also worth noting he was on the Rams sideline for every game last season.
Easley would be good rotational player. If Rams add Suh, Rams would have 4 1st rounders on the DL.
I'd say this is the kiss of death for Westbrooks or Fox.....
Good move...guy's a problem when he can play.
So we move Brockers out of NT into the LDE spot and he excels and now we fans want to move him back to NT? Nah add a NT and leave the guy where he kicked butt.
Or use Easley there in race car packages and use the NT we add along with Easley at NT.While brockers should remain the starter at DE, it would be foolish to not have packages where he's at NT and Easley and Donald at DE. Too good of a front 3 to not be used together
I'd say this is the kiss of death for Westbrooks or Fox.....
Good move...guy's a problem when he can play.
Champ there is no way Westbrook’s & Morgan Fox are gone. Those 2 are very underrated. They both play hard & are productive.
I think it means Connor Barwin might not be brought back ?
I think both Westbrooks & Fox could start on some teams....in the near future....I just don't see a place for them if we sign Suh....signed Easley....have Donald, Brockers, Smart....am I missing someone??? One or both are probably gone.I think its more likely they try and sneak Tanzel Smart onto the practice squad and let Easley back up Donald. Westbrooks can play all the down lineman spots, but is probably at his best as the backup NT. Fox probably plays heavy rotational snaps as a 5 tech on another team, so he has a lot of value as well.
Hmmmmm....there is a belief that tendons and ligaments don't strengthen like muscle....no real blood supply....anyhoots....Easley seems like one of those guys who is too athletic for his own good, like Watt, or Derrick Rose. Most humans just aren't allowed to be so explosive.