Lombardi: Who should be dealt before the deadline
- Thread starter -X-
- Start date
-
To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
.
man, if sjax does get traded i hope it is to a team like the packers. he deserves a shot at the playoffs and the superbowl. he would be beastly for the packers. they have nothing there at rb. the rams aren't making the playoffs this year so it makes sense unless jackson himself is unwilling and wants to help out the rams for another couple of years at a reduced salary rate.
.
man, if sjax does get traded i hope it is to a team like the packers. he deserves a shot at the playoffs and the superbowl. he would be beastly for the packers. they have nothing there at rb. the rams aren't making the playoffs this year so it makes sense unless jackson himself is unwilling and wants to help out the rams for another couple of years at a reduced salary rate.
.
If they had drafted RG111, Bradford could be dealt. Since he is scared to death of the end zone, perhaps he could take his "talent" to another team, where he could occupy a prominent seat on the bench.
- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #5
Yeah, if that's all you're gonna bring to this board, then this probably isn't deblaze for you.Brad Machado said:
Now if you want to scale it back and use rationale and/or specific numbers, circumstances, specific examples and other related criteria, then I'm sure we'll be happy to discuss this with you. But there's no prima facie evidence to support what you're saying here.
It would also help to know if you're actually a Rams fan.
bluecoconuts
Legend
It's funny. I was just thinking GB would be a great fit for SJ if the Pack would send us one of those WRs they have. I'd hate to see him go but an upgrade at WR would be nice.
