- Joined
- Aug 7, 2013
- Messages
- 7,161
More experienced db's sure but are there corners taller than 6'3"?I'm not so sure about Reynolds. He's going to have to excel against taller more experienced DB's. He's young, lanky and might need time to fill out. I could see him being put on the PS or IR'd.
It's going to go down to the last pre season game before the WR corps get decided.
I'm not so sure about Reynolds. He's going to have to excel against taller more experienced DB's. He's young, lanky and might need time to fill out. I could see him being put on the PS or IR'd.
It's going to go down to the last pre season game before the WR corps get decided.
He wouldn't make it to the practice squad. He was touted a huge steal where we got him. He's claimed 100% if we try and get pretty moving him to the PS.
The usual seven WRs are mentioned as if the others don't exist. Understandable. I guess.
But, what happens if Shakier Ryan makes a few explosive plays on offense (that most of the others cannot) and runs back a couple punts/kicks for TDs during preseason?
Then what?
The usual seven WRs are mentioned as if the others don't exist. Understandable. I guess.
But, what happens if Shakier Ryan makes a few explosive plays on offense (that most of the others cannot) and runs back a couple punts/kicks for TDs during preseason?
Then what?
I'd trade Pharoh, put Spruce on PS and give Ryan the 6th WR spot. I'd keep:
Woods
Austin
Kupp
Reynolds
Thomas
Ryan
Do you think Marquez makes it as a pure ST guy or do they go with a LB with the 3-4 switch in that role do you think?
He wouldn't make it to the practice squad. He was touted a huge steal where we got him. He's claimed 100% if we try and get pretty moving him to the PS.
I've said this before, I don't think Thomas, Cooper, and Spruuuuce got to where they are by going easy. I mean, they are 2nd year players and can really play. I'd be shocked if we could cut either of them and not lose something. Just recently, Kupp was shaken up going up for a play and landing hard. That kinda stuff happens to rookies...Ask Pharoh. I'd rather keep 7 wr's.....untill the 5th week or so...and see who is who. The main decider should be, who is effective outside the numbers....I believe we have an overabundance of "slot" type receivers.
Oh yeah...my boy Marquez North ....#13....can play.....
Tough to keep 7 when nobody stands out with other positions that will be tough cuts as well (linebacker) and I've been reading about Marquez North for two years...The Time is Now!
Spot on analysis, den. As usual.
If Thomas continues to show good hands through camp, he's in. He's then a complete WR, deep threat, and major ST contributor. So I guess I'm saying that he becomes the 5th WR. Maybe playing ahead of Reynolds for a year. A steal as a '16 pick in the 6th round, tbh.
I, too, favor Spruce over Cooper. He can make catches both from the slot and from the outside, constantly gets separation, plus he never seems to drop the ball. How does McVay cut such a player?
Keeping 7 WR's seems like a long shot given our other tight position battles.
So, by a process of elimination, Cooper looks like the odd man out. Damned shame, too. Good teammate, very football smart, versatile as heck, and can really contribute on ST.
The other candidates, including Marquez, appear to be victims of the numbers game.
That's my take as of June 20th, anyway.
Our WR position group has taken a quantum leap over the '16 version.
The usual seven WRs are mentioned as if the others don't exist. Understandable. I guess.
But, what happens if Shakier Ryan makes a few explosive plays on offense (that most of the others cannot) and runs back a couple punts/kicks for TDs during preseason?
Then what?