Snaz
Pro Bowler
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2016
- Messages
- 1,269
- Name
- Shawn
Bobby EvansWell if he doesn’t preform & there are better players on the roster then any player shouldn’t clog up a roster spot.
Bobby EvansWell if he doesn’t preform & there are better players on the roster then any player shouldn’t clog up a roster spot.
And yet we got beat 13-3 in the Superbowl with Saffold at LG and Sullivan at C and won with replacements Edwards at LG and Allen at C......Plus to get there it took 2 games of Noteboom at LT. Like I said, I think there's a wide difference in OL philosophy between fans and management. And right now, management has their strong results behind them, so I'd have to lean in favor of their direction. If anybody calls 2022 "bad planning" or "mismanagement" I'd ask them to tell us all what should have been done to prevent using 12 OL combinations in 15 games due to 7-9 OL injuries. The correct answer IS NOT being 2 deep at every OL position, as that is a physical impossibility.If we are to consider an alleged 'failed plan', many may feel it as a result of our declining depth after starters at LT, LG & RG were dismissed. It may have started with Sullivan being initially replaced by Allen/Blythe and then Saffold for Noteboom at LG, and this year we opened with Noteboom instead of Whitworth at LT & Shelton in place of Corbett at RG. Numerous fans have also questioned whether Edwards might have been more suitable as a reserve OT rather than a starting LG. The Rams didn't draft an offensive lineman in 2021, but it appears we may have gotten incredibly lucky on UDFA Alaric Jackson, pending his future health status. Injured players are very much out of our control, so I won't go into this aspect of the game. After Saffold left us in 2019, the Rams have drafted Bobby Evans (3'rd), David Edwards (5'th), Anchrum (7'th), Bruss (3'rd), & Arcuri (7'th). Our 1 fairly significant OL trade was for Corbett in 2019, and there have been no starting free agents brought in since Whitworth, Sullivan & waiver claim Blythe back in 2017.
The furor from drafting Tutu Atwell over Creed Humphrey last year remains strong.
Scheme may also play into fan disappointment occasionally with our lack of emphasis on the running game & moving away from 12 Personnel when it seems warranted, but nonetheless, we still managed to carry off the Lombardi Trophy, ... so WTF.
jmo.
You make good points.I get it,but first off Brian Allen should have never been drafted with Sullivan fresh off a 2 year contract & Austin Blythe as a swing G/C.McVay didn't know that? Or went ahead with letting Sullivan walk anyway? Or thought Goff was ready to wear the big boy pants by year 3 in his system and wanted to upgrade the C position physically? Then when he wasn't, he traded him to Detroit for Stafford? Well he moved us forward, that's for sure.
Yes - at what point does your coaching think he is The Rams starting RG out of OTA’sBobby Evans
And yet we got beat 13-3 in the Superbowl with Saffold at LG and Sullivan at C and won with replacements Edwards at LG and Allen at C......Plus to get there it took 2 games of Noteboom at LT. Like I said, I think there's a wide difference in OL philosophy between fans and management. And right now, management has their strong results behind them, so I'd have to lean in favor of their direction. If anybody calls 2022 "bad planning" or "mismanagement" I'd ask them to tell us all what should have been done to prevent using 12 OL combinations in 15 games due to 7-9 OL injuries. The correct answer IS NOT being 2 deep at every OL position, as that is a physical impossibility.
And yet we got beat 13-3 in the Superbowl with Saffold at LG and Sullivan at C and won with replacements Edwards at LG and Allen at C......Plus to get there it took 2 games of Noteboom at LT. Like I said, I think there's a wide difference in OL philosophy between fans and management. And right now, management has their strong results behind them, so I'd have to lean in favor of their direction. If anybody calls 2022 "bad planning" or "mismanagement" I'd ask them to tell us all what should have been done to prevent using 12 OL combinations in 15 games due to 7-9 OL injuries. The correct answer IS NOT being 2 deep at every OL position, as that is a physical impossibility.
Well Sullivan was the weak point in the SB...along with Blythe. The Pats exploited those guys. And he essentially retired after that.Well like Kupp with a rookie (best offensive lineman available) early is the way to go.
O’day should be cheep.The player I’d like to see The Rams keep of Ty,Skura,& O’day is ??
I’d say Ty Nys.because he is a stop gap plug in LT.The big question is if he can play RT well.
He could start over Noteboom &
move from LT to RT if Havienstien gets hurt.
To me it’s about building a foundation of players in case of injury as well.Building it this way,but through the draft.
Les Snead & Sean Mcvay not addressing G/C 2020 & 2021 is inexcusable. Let’s leave Tutu Atwell out of this.He is what he is & he is a young ascending Ram who has ALL The Veteran & coaching support he ever needs
to be successful.-Speed Kills!
The other player is Matt Skura he is big enough to be a solid guard,but if he gets a full it’s & training camp after already knowing the offense might be that C/G The Rams need ?
The way I see it is The Rams don’t value the CENTER SPOT as much as maybe they should have. Cutting John Sullivan in 2019 led to The Rams not making the playoffs.
Evans is only on par with himself, he doesn't belong in the NFL. Even Kolone played somewhat better and he's been bumped by Skura.
Skura hasn't been playing at his strongest position which is at Center, not OG.
It's all good.My WTF wasn't aimed at you, it was about how much & how often we try to decipher what is going on, anything can still happen. I mostly agree with you, although I also believe that Sullivan wasn't his previous self as that Super Bowl season went on, I thought he was done and pretty happy that he wouldn't be returning. Of course, there were far more factors than just our OL for the 2018 S.B. failure, McVay has already admitted to that. I agree about the wide gulf of occurrences between fan & coaching philosophy, usually showing up when we are losing, although I don't participate in much game day second guessing myself, but when we appear to abandon the run, play our CB's 10 yards off consistently, use a guy like Evans repeatedly as a starter, or back off from 12 Personnel when our many excellent WR's are sidelined by injuries, then criticisms should be acceptable, even if not always correct. This season was lost due to an impossible injury count, the bulk of criticism is aimed at OL depth, and I happen to agree with this for the most part, we should have done better in replacing key players, whether thru the draft, trades or free agency, and this was a belief before being riddled with injuries.
Considering your statement on not being 2 deep at every OL position, we may actually be closer to such a thing than in awhile next year, taking into account all of the returning players and what may happen next off-season during the draft/free agency periods.
jmo.
It's all good.
I am hoping McVay realized that 12 is the way to go. When he came to the Rams that is what we were told we'd see (from the talking heads). A lot of 12 personnel and his very first pick was a TE. But it seems that went by the wayside.....until Sunday. We played 12P 49% of the time and it had an astounding affect. Denver helped, of course but that works. Everybody knows when they're run blocking, an OL gets energized. And with 2 TEs on the field, play action opens up all kinds of possibilities which we also saw. Our top 2 receivers were TE's.....12 receptions, 151 yards, 2 TDs. The WRs had 8 for 45. Imagine Stafford under center, the OL, Kupp, Robinson and 2 TEs blocking for Akers, Williams and a third RB, the play action will be unbelievable. I know I'm repeating myself but get that TE beast from Georgia in the 2nd round and let him loose!
1000%And yet we got beat 13-3 in the Superbowl with Saffold at LG and Sullivan at C and won with replacements Edwards at LG and Allen at C......Plus to get there it took 2 games of Noteboom at LT. Like I said, I think there's a wide difference in OL philosophy between fans and management. And right now, management has their strong results behind them, so I'd have to lean in favor of their direction. If anybody calls 2022 "bad planning" or "mismanagement" I'd ask them to tell us all what should have been done to prevent using 12 OL combinations in 15 games due to 7-9 OL injuries. The correct answer IS NOT being 2 deep at every OL position, as that is a physical impossibility.
I think it has been a lot of luck, which I'm assuming they were banking on. Didn't pan out in 2019, or this year. The Whit acquisition paid huge dividends for 5 years. I find it puzzling that doesn't strike our FO as a sound strategy, since it worked out so well for them.Faulty plan?
No foundation?
Ill-prepared for injuries?
Or have they managed to assemble O lines good enough to win....in fact dominate at times.....in the NFL?
They value OL. Just not like some other teams. And those other teams. How many Lombardi's do they have the last 5 years?1000%
The Rams want continuity on the OL. They don’t want to throw fat FA contracts or premium picks at it.
An OL either holds up or it doesn’t. It’s either a cohesive unit or just a bunch of guys (talented or not) trying to block.. It’s there so other guys can make the big plays. Pro bowl RG’s and Centers don’t make big plays.
It's not luck. It's fiscal responsibility. Laramy Tunsil just announced he wants to be the highest paid LT. He's #3 on the list currently. WTF, has he done that has made his team winners and earned him the highest paid moniker? They're 2-12-1 !!!! Yeah, that's great they have a franchise LT!!!I think it has been a lot of luck, which I'm assuming they were banking on. Didn't pan out in 2019, or this year. The Whit acquisition paid huge dividends for 5 years. I find it puzzling that doesn't strike our FO as a sound strategy, since it worked out so well for them.
With some luck on the health front.. and maybe keeping 9-10 OL on the roster next year.. there's an argument to be made that the Rams don't have to bring in any new offensive linemen.
Jourdan seems to think a line of Jackson, Noteboom, Shelton, Bruss or Anchrum and Havenstein is possible. You'd keep Nsekhe, Aboushi, Arcuri, Brewer and Skura or Allen to backup Shelton.
You would have enough medical information on Jackson to make a decision on that. Blod clots are treatable, so.. we'll see.It may be one thing to feel you can go with them and another to prepare for the future as Noteboom & Allen are big injury risks, Jackson's health is pretty uncertain, and Shelton & Anchrum become free agents following the 2023 season.
You would have enough medical information on Jackson to make a decision on that. Blod clots are treatable, so.. we'll see.
Noteboom and Allen ARE big injury risks.. that's why I'd keep 10 OL.
If you lose all four you mention at the end of 23.. you may have one PS guy ready to bump up to the roster.. and you'll draft some replacements and maybe sign a low-end FA or two for depth.
I'm not advocating for that.. I'm saying it's reasonable. I'd, for sure, draft a decent Center.
All very reasonable.It will be interesting to see whether the Rams have the brass to unload Allen's contract, they'd need to have some major confidence in Sheldon/Skura to do such a thing, so I'm on the doubtful side about Allen being given his walking papers at least until 2024.
I'll assume Edwards & Evans are history following this season, and while many had Shelton or Anchrum penciled in as a potential LG replacement, neither have proven to be particularly sufficient for starting roles yet, Shelton appears better as a Center imo.
The upcoming draft looks to have a few quality C/OG types that should be available in the higher rounds, drafting a starting LG who later becomes our future starter (2024) at Center seems a wise move. Because Noteboom/Jackson are questionable for permanent LT jobs, I might also seek out a mid-round LT prospect to compete with Arcuri as our swing OT.
jmo.