Josh Gordon and LA will likely be a volatile mix. I don't like the idea of having his influence around the team.
I say we trade up for Wentz and offer the browns a 5th for Gordon.. Definitely worth the gamble in my humble opinion...
Sounds like a good time for me to post something creepy.
I'm surprised to see posted opinions from one extreme to the other regarding Gordon.
Myself, I consider him untouchable.
Manziel, too.
Both are flawed beyond reasonable standards and would require babysitting 24/7.
It's bad enough when we lose a player's services to injury every year, as with Long and Saffold. But to lose a player to a self inflicted suspension?
Oh, HELL no!
His future is truly up to him only he can control his urges and continue to seek help for his maladies. I don't believe L.A would be any more or less of a distraction he needs to face his demons and overcome and that takes help in any city. This is not yesterday's L.A. Healthy eating, sobriety, exercise and a positive lifestyle are on a huge upswing for the last several years. Anywhere he goes he will have to get with the right group seek help and participate in his success, leaving L.A as good a home as anywhere. The choice is his and the risk is no greater here.
I agree the risk factor may not be a great match but what a home run if he gets it. yeah big IF...
I have worked with young drug addicts for about 12 years now. At one time it was a full time job. I know that my observations are just mine, but things I have seen and learned over the years should count for something. The young men and women that started young are the ones that I never had success with. Something is in them deep down that just seems unchangeable, at least while they are still in their 20s to 30s. The guys that started as casual partiers had more success turning it around. I don't know which group Josh is in but one thing rings true with all of them. To get by they needed to not be around it. I know their will be people preying on weakness like his in every city, but LA has a higher population than most cities and a lot more enticements because of it.
He should go to Green Bay or Minnesota IMO.
Yeah, I understand. It certainly seems to take the young ones longer to hit their bottom. I have been around this awhile myself (both sides) The decision is his and i hope he find his way before he ruins a golden opportunity and a potentially very productive career. Sometime the smaller cities have even greater temptations do to less activity but it goes either way. Geographics never worked for me. It is truly on him. Keep working with those youngsters you are making a difference even if you don't see it right away. I respect your work and opinion Gnome admirable profession brother kudo'sI have worked with young drug addicts for about 12 years now. At one time it was a full time job. I know that my observations are just mine, but things I have seen and learned over the years should count for something. The young men and women that started young are the ones that I never had success with. Something is in them deep down that just seems unchangeable, at least while they are still in their 20s to 30s. The guys that started as casual partiers had more success turning it around. I don't know which group Josh is in but one thing rings true with all of them. To get by they needed to not be around it. I know their will be people preying on weakness like his in every city, but LA has a higher population than most cities and a lot more enticements because of it.
He should go to Green Bay or Minnesota IMO.