- Joined
- Jun 3, 2014
- Messages
- 5,342
I know I am in the vast minority in saying this (queue the rocks and torches ) but I usually found Thomas to be pretty objective.
Whether he has sources or not, he's covered this team for a very long time, and he's been right more than he's been wrong - even if his assessment isn't very glowing.
Every year, we read his chats and poke holes in the negatives... then, at the end of the year, if you look back, much of what he wrote came to fruition (sadly).
So... here we are in 2016 reading the chats again and critiquing as we want. It's our prerogative.
I just hope he's dead wrong on a lot of what he's writing for 2016.
Whether he has sources or not, he's covered this team for a very long time, and he's been right more than he's been wrong - even if his assessment isn't very glowing.
Every year, we read his chats and poke holes in the negatives... then, at the end of the year, if you look back, much of what he wrote came to fruition (sadly).
So... here we are in 2016 reading the chats again and critiquing as we want. It's our prerogative.
I just hope he's dead wrong on a lot of what he's writing for 2016.