Elmgrovegnome
Legend
Well it was right after the game and it is possible that after reviewing it they felt differently. It looked to me like both JJ and McLeod should have been covering the receiver on that play.
My brother mentioned the same thing to me.That's hard to believe. It appeared to me that McLeod crashed down on Welker running a dig when Welker was well accounted for. If Jenkins was going to have to run with Sanders, he was going to be in poor position because of the technique on the play.
But I can't really argue with Fisher on a Rams defensive scheme.
The miscommunication was similar to the one on the Robinson sack play. It is a young team. I expect Rodney to stop making those mistakes, but if Fisher is admitting to coaching mistake I can only think they called an overly aggressive play. Rodney bit thinking he'd have a big play; this happening the same time Janoris peeled off thinking he might see a big play. This was a misread, mis-diagnosed play in the game. . . One of the only ones. This defense played extremely well.
Although I am in the wagon of put Joyner at FS and move Mcloed. I truly believe Mcloed played a pretty great game. The one blown coverage of course, but he was all over the field - to the same degree as Mcdonald and Olgeltree
Both JJ and McLeod have had their good, bad and ugly moments this year.
However, even if that was Jenkins' man, isn't the job of the safety not to allow a man behind him??
I think it depends. If its a 3-deep coverage, McLeod only has middle 1/3rd of the field, while Jenkins has left 1/3rd. Without knowing the call, we as fans can't really know who's at fault.
That was odd yesterday. I don't know why Jenkins would be releasing someone to the safety. No one appeared to be coming into lower zone where he would rotate up. But it has been a problem where one or the other.....or maybe even both are missing their keys or not understanding their assignments. And it's happened more than once, so you know our opponents already have seen it on tape.
I agree with this. I also think this will fit his style of making breaks on the ball. Playing the slot might allow him to undercut routes and get his hands on more balls. I could be totally off-base but just some thoughts...I said it before this game, I think JJ is better suited for the slot. I could be totally wrong. I'd like to at least see them try it, though. Jenkins gets burned too many times for my liking. Sure, he has his good moments but they aren't as game changing as his mistakes. Have Johnson and Gaines on the outside, JJ in the slot, Joyner at FS, and TJ Mac at SS. If JJ does make a mistake, at least it most likely wouldn't go for a TD like it usually does when he blows it. I think Joyner is better suited at FS, also.
Exactly, and if he does try a risky move and is wrong, there's less likelihood that it'll result in a TD like that have been on the outside. I'm pretty adamant about Joyner to FS, too. Maybe even more so than JJ to the slot.I agree with this. I also think this will fit his style of making breaks on the ball. Playing the slot might allow him to undercut routes and get his hands on more balls. I could be totally off-base but just some thoughts...
I think Joyner is going to be a good player anywhere on the field...I think it's going to take him another season to really show it though.Exactly, and if he does try a risky move and is wrong, there's less likelihood that it'll result in a TD like that have been on the outside. I'm pretty adamant about Joyner to FS, too. Maybe even more so than JJ to the slot.
I personally think Joyner is too slow and not quick enough for slot. I've seen him trailing his guy by a good margin too many times for my liking. His height doesn't help, either. His instincts and effort will prevent him from failing but I don't think he'll ever be what I would call "good" at slot. He's looked much better at FS the few times I've seen him there.I think Joyner is going to be a good player anywhere on the field...I think it's going to take him another season to really show it though.
One thing that I do like about our secondary is that there is versatility and the ability for a few guys to play in different positions.