- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
- Messages
- 23,279
- Name
- mojo
I too think it's something more. I don't think Fisher recognizes the critically inherent traits of a good NFL QB. Competitiveness, attitude, moxie, leadership....i don't think he necessarily gets it in terms of relating that to a philosophy of conservative possession run first football. You can't just insert a game managing QB into that template and expect results in today's NFL. Bradford was a smart, team guy with a good NFL arm. Foles is a team guy with some leadership qualities. Do either of these QB's strike anyone as guys who absolutely hate to lose? Not saying their bad teammates but IMO they just don't have that ultra-competitive type, ego-centric attitude which often translates to true leadership(as long as their personality doesn't rub the locker room the wrong way).No question if we had quality performance at QB, we'd be better. No disagreement there.
Yet, with Fisher's offensive track record over 20 seasons, is he really that unlucky finding "the right one"?
How much better would this team be with a top 16 offense? Tampa has one with a rookie QB. The Jets are top 16 with Ryan Fitzpatrick. Houston is top 16 with Brian Hoyer and TJ Yates.
And... guess what? Philadelphia is top 16 with former Ram - Sam Bradford.
If Fisher had a top 16 offense, we'd have 2 more wins. One could argue, potentially 3-4 more wins.
I agree a quality QB will help, but there's something else going on here than just that.
(And... I'm in the keep Fisher camp)
IMO Fisher has been looking for a QB who can play a role in HIS offense rather than a QB who can LEAD men and take full responsibility for wins and losses and hold his teammates accountable....so to speak.
Last edited: