- Joined
- Dec 5, 2018
- Messages
- 1,009
I've been a Rams fan since 1984, so I'm aware stuff like this happens.Your defensive reaction there, btw, is rarely beneficial to something like this. It was that type of reaction that led so many to reject Stafford. Fact is previous Super Bowls were won without AD or a dominant 3T, and more will be won without that in the future. Hopefully the Rams don't end up there but if they do I think we're gonna be ok.
I have zero clue what me thinking it would be a mistake to let the heart and soul and best defensive player in the league go, has to do with Stafford, who by the way, I was delighted we got. Or even why my opinion is any less beneficial (whatever the fuck that means on a message board that is designed to encourage other viewpoints) than yours.
Maybe I was unclear with what I meant, or maybe you were just rushing to react based on what others have said. But, I'm looking at this purely from a Rams perspective, I couldn't give a shit how other teams historically won Super Bowls because this is about our Rams NOW. The past is totally irrelevant.
If you had taken Miller and Donald out of this team in the playoffs we almost certainly wouldn't have won it all. At this stage, and on paper, we have downgraded almost everywhere even if all the losses were expected. But losing Donald on top of Miller, Seabass and Williams from this D would take a lot of recovering from and I doubt we do it this year with draft picks.
In any case, I highly doubt McVay and Snead let him go because gathering draft picks by letting game-changers walk is not their MO, so I think this will all be moot.