FarNorth
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2014
- Messages
- 3,063
Disagree. A lot of value in the 80-120 range.
Not saying you trade down far, but just picking up an early 4th after dropping back 5 or 6 spots is a good deal.
In fact you could then package that 4th and a 6th and move back up into that sweet spot in 80-95 range.
Then you end up with three 3rds and essentially 5 top 100 picks.... And still have one 4th left... Maybe two if you trade down with both 2nds.
IMO we are already squarely in the high value range: picks 52 (2nd), 57 (2nd), 84 (3rd), 104 (3rd rd comp), 126 (4th). As you point out there is always the possibility of an opportunity for a tactical trade down of a few spots, and then perhaps a trade-up-- should a clear opportunity to do both materialize-- but in general we are well positioned now. My point is there is no need for a pre-draft STRATEGY to trade down.
This is a key draft for the Rams. As other posters have pointed out, we are shifting away from the high price free agent signings which we could afford before resigning Goff, and before trading for Ramsay, with the need to resign him and Kupp. We need high value, low cost impact players for the next several years. We have an opportunity to take big steps in this direction in this draft.
Our 5 high value picks seem to be well matched to meet our needs for impact players at a small number of positions. These are well recognized by our astute posters on this board, with minor differences over top priorities. The result is that this should enable us to play the board for BPA available at these positions.
It seems reasonable to anticipate that we may have initial opportunities for talented impact players at WR (because of the depth of the draft) and RB (because the position seems to be undervalued), while o-line and especially center would likely fall toward the bottom of our second day picks. But should an outstanding linebacker or edge rusher be available for our top second round picks we can go that direction, knowing that we still can get at least good value players at the other positions later. This gives us tremendous flexibility for using the picks.
In short, I see this draft as crucial to rebuilding our roster in the new direction discussed above. The Cooks trade for another second was essential to create this possibility. Needless to say, Snead and McVay need to again demonstrate their ability to select really good players. But the opportunity to do so should be there.