No clue. I'm just thinking with the total lack of success of supplemental prospects (how successful can we call Gordon when he can't get on the field) that it's probably wise to stay clear of it altogether. While really none of our 5th round picks under the Fisher/Snead regime has turned into a long term player for us, I still think a 5th round pick is a decent piece of real estate to either package in trade or make a selection. Again we may be able to retain Battle and next year he may kick butt and become a good player for us.Had to use something to get a look though. Kinda hyped up going into the supplemental, so do you think they could have gotten him with a 6th instead?
They don't reveal picks that are after the winning pick, all you have to go off is word of mouth and conjecture.Wasn't our bid of a 5th rounder the only one? No one else even bid a 7th rounder so he's probably safe on the PS at least. He didn't make himself standout during the pre-season but didn't stink it up either. Another just wait and see......
Or you could be pleased that our other O-linemen are better than him and still he is good enough to be picked up by someone else.If he gets claimed off waivers, I'm going to be extremely disappointed in the FO.
Just wanted to back you on this. I had three years of French in HS. That is indeed French though I believe it should have been, "Dude's un fucktard."Dude's a fucktard.
Excuse my French.
Oui. Je suis desole.Just wanted to back you on this. I had three years of French in HS. That is indeed French though I believe it should have been, "Dude's un fucktard."