One of the many instances where I was wrong.
No use to run and hide from it. If we did that trade we wouldn't have Aaron Donald. That would have been one of the worst trades of all time.I applaud your humility.
When I saw this at the top of the board I was wondering what was going on. Glad to see we're just having fun - and not trading a first round pick for him.
For the record, I wanted to trade for Lamar Miller last year when we was sitting on Detroit's bench. He had a productive year this year with the Dolphins but I think we're fine at RB, so I'm glad we didn't trade for him either.
One of the many instances where I was wrong.
I still think Trent is in the wrong scheme. Think he'd be dramatically better if he was in Alabama's style ZBS with a decent OL.
In other words if he had 5 yard wide holes to run through he'd be ok LOL.
I think the Browns got fleeced.Here's something to consider regarding Richardson: The pick the Browns got in trade for him was the one they used to pick Manziel.
So did the Browns make a net profit off this trade?
Here's something to consider regarding Richardson: The pick the Browns got in trade for him was the one they used to pick Manziel.
So did the Browns make a net profit off this trade?
You're right. So they gave up Trent Richardson and a 3rd rounder.Actually the Brownies traded UP to get Johnny Tricycle.
Not what I said at all. Zone blocking and man blocking are completely different and require different skillsets and different "vision" if you will. Some guys can play in both, but a lot of guys can't. It's one or the other. He's being asked to basically relearn how to play RB right now.
Also, the Colts have one of the worst lines in the NFL. Hard enough to run in the wrong scheme, even harder to run when you're being hit in the backfield and THEN you still don't know what the hell is going on in front of you.
I'm not making excuses for him, he should have done a lot better than he has even despite this, but it makes sense why he hasn't succeeded.
He's been the low man on the totem pole on two different teams and doesn't have a rep for being good enough.
That crappy OL in Indy is netting the other RB's 4.7 per tote and 4.5 per tote on about 150 carries . He's getting 3.3 and he got the lions share of the carries early on until they wisely benched him.
The QB is a better RB than he is, and he wil be out of the NFL in a year.
Rams dodged an arrow on this.
And the "Colts have no weapons it's all Luck getting it done" narrative is some big time media hype. That team is well stocked with weapons.
Here's something to consider regarding Richardson: The pick the Browns got in trade for him was the one they used to pick Manziel.
So did the Browns make a net profit off this trade?
I applaud your humility.
When I saw this at the top of the board I was wondering what was going on. Glad to see we're just having fun - and not trading a first round pick for him.
For the record, I wanted to trade for Lamar Miller last year when we was sitting on Detroit's bench. He had a productive year this year with the Dolphins but I think we're fine at RB, so I'm glad we didn't trade for him either.