I thought it was very political. Can you picture Jeanty playing for Colorado and Hunter playing for Texas? Who do you think wins in that scenario?
Not sure,
That scenario implies the "Deion effect" which becomes the crux of the issue.
Did Deion's personality supersede the on-field performances?
I agree that Jeanty would have been a well deserved winner of the Heisman. The caveat is was Travis not deserving of the award? I think one could argue that he was less deserving and that has merit but to say he wasn't deserving can be debated.
Travis played both ways at a very high level top 10 of each CB & WR and that is quite an impressive task. The argument that he needed to be a #1 at one or the other to win is specious to me.
I see the award as a tribute to the best overall performance in college football for the given season and both players had strong cases.
It was a tough competition and Deion's presence brought extra national attention to the already high profile #1 overall national prospect entering college and that certainly didn't hurt.
I don't think Jeanty could have done much more and don't think Travis did anything to hurt his position.
I don't think anyone made an egregious error voting for Travis