- Joined
- Feb 8, 2016
- Messages
- 572
None of us really knows as much as we think about these guys, but what are your impressions of our draft picks?
I'm going to grade them by the following designations:
A) Will eventually start and be a good player AT LEAST
B) Will help the team - spot starter or situational player (nickel, rotational, etc)
C) Reserve player or special teams mainstay
D) Functional - may develop - maybe not...we'll see
F) What the heck were the Rams thinking?
Rapp - looks to be a good, tough player at a position we'll need need in a year or 2.
Grade: A
Henderson - looks electric, one cut and gone type of player.
Grade: B
Long - Really like this pick - looks like what you would want a CB to look and play like
Grade: A
Evans - limited a bit athletically, but seems to have good vision and positions himself well. We'll see if he can be coached up a bit.
Grade: C/D
Gaines - squatty-looking but tough DT - his conference foes seem to respect his game
Grade: B/C
Edwards - was injured a bit last season - needs help with pass protection skills. But he really looks good with most other aspects of his game.
Grade: A
Scott - Good special teams guy...not sure if he can handle any duties other than that, but perhaps ST's was why he was drafted?...not sure if you want to have a guy that only plays ST's taking up a space on the roster. But I consider ST's to be more important than the average person I think, so...
Grade: C/D
Allen - I like the pick. Not sure if he sticks with the team, but he plays ILB, a position "of need". Was rated fairly high from what I've read. He had an "off field" issue which I believe was resolved. I have a feeling he makes the team and becomes a factor.
Grade: B/C
My designations are pretty literal, so for example if I grade a guy as a "D", it doesn't mean he sucks.
It means I'm not sure...he shows some promise, but also has some obvious limitations - depends on if he learns, if he fits the system, etc.
Hit me!
I'm going to grade them by the following designations:
A) Will eventually start and be a good player AT LEAST
B) Will help the team - spot starter or situational player (nickel, rotational, etc)
C) Reserve player or special teams mainstay
D) Functional - may develop - maybe not...we'll see
F) What the heck were the Rams thinking?
Rapp - looks to be a good, tough player at a position we'll need need in a year or 2.
Grade: A
Henderson - looks electric, one cut and gone type of player.
Grade: B
Long - Really like this pick - looks like what you would want a CB to look and play like
Grade: A
Evans - limited a bit athletically, but seems to have good vision and positions himself well. We'll see if he can be coached up a bit.
Grade: C/D
Gaines - squatty-looking but tough DT - his conference foes seem to respect his game
Grade: B/C
Edwards - was injured a bit last season - needs help with pass protection skills. But he really looks good with most other aspects of his game.
Grade: A
Scott - Good special teams guy...not sure if he can handle any duties other than that, but perhaps ST's was why he was drafted?...not sure if you want to have a guy that only plays ST's taking up a space on the roster. But I consider ST's to be more important than the average person I think, so...
Grade: C/D
Allen - I like the pick. Not sure if he sticks with the team, but he plays ILB, a position "of need". Was rated fairly high from what I've read. He had an "off field" issue which I believe was resolved. I have a feeling he makes the team and becomes a factor.
Grade: B/C
My designations are pretty literal, so for example if I grade a guy as a "D", it doesn't mean he sucks.
It means I'm not sure...he shows some promise, but also has some obvious limitations - depends on if he learns, if he fits the system, etc.
Hit me!